Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Co-activators and Co-repressors

Co-activators and Co-repressors

Gene transcription is regulated by the synergistic action of several proteins that form a complex at a gene regulatory site. This is observed in eukaryotes, where the regulation of gene expression is a complex process. Regulatory proteins in eukaryotes can broadly be classified into two types – regulators that bind directly to specific DNA sequences and co-regulators that associate with regulatory proteins but cannot directly bind to the DNA. These co-regulators are further divided into...

Co-activators and Co-repressors

Co-activators and Co-repressors

Gene transcription is regulated by the synergistic action of several proteins that form a complex at a gene regulatory site. This is observed in eukaryotes, where the regulation of gene expression is a complex process. Regulatory proteins in eukaryotes can broadly be classified into two types – regulators that bind directly to specific DNA sequences and co-regulators that associate with regulatory proteins but cannot directly bind to the DNA. These co-regulators are further divided into...

RNA Polymerase II Accessory Proteins

RNA Polymerase II Accessory Proteins

Proteins that regulate transcription can do so either via direct contact with RNA Polymerase or through indirect interactions facilitated by adaptors, mediators, histone-modifying proteins, and nucleosome remodelers. Direct interactions to activate transcription is seen in bacteria as well as in some eukaryotic genes. In these cases, upstream activation sequences are adjacent to the promoters, and the activator proteins interact directly with the transcriptional machinery. For example, in...

Master Transcription Regulators

Master Transcription Regulators

Master transcription regulators are regulatory proteins that are predominantly responsible for regulating the expression of multiple genes. Often these genes work in concert to drive a complex process. Activation of a master transcription regulator can lead to a cascade of transcriptional activation necessary for that outcome. These regulators can directly bind to the regulatory sequences of the various genes involved, or they can indirectly regulate transcription by binding to regulatory...

Master Transcription Regulators

Master Transcription Regulators

Master transcription regulators are regulatory proteins that are predominantly responsible for regulating the expression of multiple genes. Often these genes work in concert to drive a complex process. Activation of a master transcription regulator can lead to a cascade of transcriptional activation necessary for that outcome. These regulators can directly bind to the regulatory sequences of the various genes involved, or they can indirectly regulate transcription by binding to regulatory...

Regulation of Nuclear Protein Sorting

Regulation of Nuclear Protein Sorting

Nuclear protein sorting regulates nucleus composition and gene expression, crucial for determining the fate of a eukaryotic cell. Hence, the entry and exit of molecules across the nuclear envelope is a tightly controlled process. Nuclear protein sorting can be inhibited by one of the following ways: 1) masking cargo signal sequences, 2) modifying the nuclear receptor's affinity for cargo, 3) controlling the nuclear pore size, 4) retaining the cargo during its transit to the cytosol or the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

7,7"-dimethoxyagastisflavone induced MYCN/MYBL2-dependent apoptosis and metabolism reprogramming in Sonic Hedgehog medulloblastoma.

Journal of translational medicine·2026

Same author

Delivery of LOXL1-AS1-siRNAs using targeting peptide-engineered extracellular vesicles with focused ultrasound to suppress medulloblastoma metastasis.

Journal of nanobiotechnology·2025

Same author

Blockade of Src signaling prevented stemness gene expression and proliferation of patient-derived gastric cancer stem cells.

Tzu chi medical journal·2025

Same author

Melatonin Alleviates Albumin-Induced Tubular Cell Injury by Activating Clock-Controlled Nuclear Enriched Abundant Transcript 1-Mediated Proliferation.

ACS pharmacology & translational science·2024

Same author

RRM2 inhibition alters cell cycle through ATM/Rb/E2F1 pathway in atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor.

Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.)·2024

Same author

Hypermethylation of the Gene Body in <i>SRCIN1</i> Is Involved in Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation and Is a Potential Blood-Based Biomarker for Early Detection and a Poor Prognosis.

Biomolecules·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2026

In Vitro SUMOylation Assay to Study SUMO E3 Ligase Activity

In Vitro SUMOylation Assay to Study SUMO E3 Ligase Activity

Published on: January 29, 2018

SUMO modification modulates the transrepression activity of PLZF.

Ting-Ting Chao¹, Che-Chang Chang, Hsiu-Ming Shih

¹Graduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

|May 15, 2007

Summary

Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) modification impacts gene transcription. SUMOylation of transcription factor PLZF is crucial for its repression activity and growth suppression, but not nuclear body formation.

More Related Videos

Utilizing a Comprehensive Immunoprecipitation Enrichment System to Identify an Endogenous Post-translational Modification Profile for Target Proteins

Published on: January 8, 2018

Investigating Interactions Between Histone Modifying Enzymes and Transcription Factors in vivo by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer

Investigating Interactions Between Histone Modifying Enzymes and Transcription Factors in vivo by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer

Published on: October 14, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2026

In Vitro SUMOylation Assay to Study SUMO E3 Ligase Activity

In Vitro SUMOylation Assay to Study SUMO E3 Ligase Activity

Published on: January 29, 2018

Utilizing a Comprehensive Immunoprecipitation Enrichment System to Identify an Endogenous Post-translational Modification Profile for Target Proteins

Published on: January 8, 2018

Investigating Interactions Between Histone Modifying Enzymes and Transcription Factors in vivo by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer

Investigating Interactions Between Histone Modifying Enzymes and Transcription Factors in vivo by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer

Published on: October 14, 2022

Area of Science:

Molecular Biology
Gene Regulation
Post-translational Modifications

Background:

Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) conjugation is a key post-translational modification involved in various cellular processes.
SUMOylation has been linked to transcriptional regulation and the formation of nuclear bodies.
The role of SUMOylation in the function of specific transcription factors, like PLZF, remains to be fully elucidated.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the role of SUMO modification in the function of the transcription factor PLZF.
To determine if SUMOylation affects PLZF's ability to form nuclear bodies and regulate gene transcription.
To assess the impact of SUMOylation on PLZF-mediated cellular functions, such as growth suppression.

Main Methods:

Site-directed mutagenesis was used to convert SUMO acceptor lysine residues in PLZF to arginine (PLZF-3KR).
Immunofluorescence microscopy was employed to examine PLZF nuclear body formation.
Reporter gene assays were utilized to measure PLZF's transcriptional repression activity.
Cell proliferation assays were conducted to assess PLZF-mediated growth suppression.

Main Results:

PLZF is SUMO modified at lysine residues 242, 387, and 396.
Mutation of these SUMOylation sites (PLZF-3KR) did not significantly alter PLZF nuclear body formation.
The PLZF-3KR mutant exhibited markedly reduced transcriptional repression activity.
Loss of PLZF sumoylation correlated with a significant reduction in PLZF-mediated growth suppression.

Conclusions:

SUMO modification plays a critical role in the transcriptional repression activity of PLZF.
SUMOylation of PLZF is essential for its function in growth suppression.
Unlike PML sumoylation, PLZF sumoylation is not required for its nuclear body formation, highlighting distinct roles of SUMOylation in different transcription factors.