Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Naturalistic Observations

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Pretreatment depression severity in breast cancer patients and its relation to treatment response to behavior therapy.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2015

Same author

Evaluation of underlying mechanisms in the link between childhood ADHD symptoms and risk for early initiation of substance use.

Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors·2014

Same author

Behavioral activation for depressed breast cancer patients: the impact of therapeutic compliance and quantity of activities completed on symptom reduction.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·2013

Same author

Pragmatic psychodynamic psychotherapy for a patient with depression and breast cancer: functional MRI evaluation of treatment effects.

American journal of psychotherapy·2013

Same author

Cognitive behavioral therapy for depression and anxiety in Parkinson's disease: a clinical review.

Journal of Parkinson's disease·2013

Same author

Predictors of treatment satisfaction among older adults with anxiety in a primary care psychology program.

Evaluation and program planning·2013

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

The Environmental Reward Observation Scale (EROS): development, validity, and reliability.

Maria E A Armento¹, Derek R Hopko

¹University of Tennessee, USA.

Behavior Therapy

|May 15, 2007

Summary

Researchers developed the Environmental Reward Observation Scale (EROS) to measure environmental reward, finding it a reliable and valid tool. This scale aids in assessing mood states and depression by quantifying rewarding experiences.

More Related Videos

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood

Published on: February 11, 2017

An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status

An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status

Published on: February 3, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood

Published on: February 11, 2017

An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status

An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status

Published on: February 3, 2022

Area of Science:

Psychology
Clinical Psychology
Psychometrics

Background:

Environmental reward significantly influences affective mood states, particularly in depression.
Existing self-report measures for environmental reward lack efficiency, reliability, and validity.
Behavioral theories highlight environmental reward as a key mediator of affect.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and validate the Environmental Reward Observation Scale (EROS).
To provide a brief, reliable, and valid self-report measure of environmental reward.
To enhance the psychological assessment of mood states, including depression.

Main Methods:

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to establish the EROS's structure and reliability.
Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed using established scales like the Pleasant Events Schedule (PES).
Hierarchical regression analyses examined the ecological validity of the EROS in predicting daily rewarding activities.

Main Results:

The EROS demonstrated strong internal consistency and test-retest reliability, supporting a unidimensional 10-item structure.
Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed an excellent fit to the 1-factor model, with robust construct validity.
The EROS showed moderate correlations with the PES and significantly predicted time spent in rewarding behaviors, even beyond depressive symptoms.

Conclusions:

The Environmental Reward Observation Scale (EROS) is a brief, reliable, and valid measure of environmental reward.
The EROS can improve the psychological assessment of negative mood states, such as clinical depression.
This scale offers a valuable tool for research and clinical practice concerning affect and depression.