Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

06:46
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
Published on: March 18, 2019
The relationship between spatial pooling and attention in saccadic and perceptual tasks
Elias H Cohen1, Brian S Schnitzer, Timothy M Gersch
1Department of Psychology and Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, 152 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Vision Research
|May 15, 2007
Summary
Attention effectively filters visual information, guiding eye movements (saccades) to spatially extended targets even with distractors present. This filtering ensures saccadic landing positions are primarily determined by target elements, not surrounding visual noise.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Ocular Motor Control
- Visual Perception
Background:
- Saccades to extended targets normally land centrally, based on pooled information.
- Prior research suggested saccadic errors with distractors, implying indiscriminate spatial pooling without effective filtering.
- The role of attention in filtering visual input for saccade guidance remained unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effectiveness of attentional filtering in saccadic localization with interleaved targets and distractors.
- To determine if attention influences spatial pooling for saccade guidance.
- To examine the impact of pre-saccadic filtering on perceptual judgments.
Main Methods:
- Saccadic eye movements were recorded for targets (discs) interleaved with distractors (discs of a different color).
- Spatial pooling and selection were constrained to the same region by interleaving elements.
- Concurrent perceptual judgments (estimating mean disc size) were made for both target and distractor elements.
Main Results:
- Saccadic landing positions were predominantly determined by the target elements, indicating effective filtering.
- Perceptual performance was better for target discs than distractors, confirming attentional allocation to targets.
- Pre-saccadic filtering constrained both saccadic localization and perceptual judgments.
Conclusions:
- Attention plays a crucial role in setting the input for spatial pooling guiding saccades to extended targets.
- Pre-saccadic filtering influences not only eye movements but also perceptual judgments, even those with seemingly low attentional demands.
- These findings highlight the integrated nature of attention, perception, and action in visual processing.

