Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Crossover Experiments

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...

Blinding

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

Clinical Trials

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Efficacy of digital therapeutic sinCephalea for personalised nutrition versus control for migraine prevention: A 12-week open-label randomised clinical trial.

Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache·2026

Same author

Simulated surface and toilet contamination during norovirus gastroenteritis: the role of toilet flushing, murine norovirus persistence, and inactivation by household and toilet cleaners.

The Journal of hospital infection·2026

Same author

Simlukafusp alfa (FAP-IL2v) plus atezolizumab with or without bevacizumab in unresectable, metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomized, open-label phase Ib study.

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer·2026

Same author

Biomarkers of activity from a phase I study of cergutuzumab amunaleukin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer·2026

Same author

Addition of metamizole to paracetamol at home after painful ambulatory arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A double-blind randomised controlled superiority trial.

European journal of anaesthesiology·2025

Same author

Cergutuzumab Amunaleukin in Combination with Atezolizumab in Patients with Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Positive Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2026

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers

Published on: January 5, 2024

Controlled trials in pediatric migraine: crossover versus parallel group.

¹Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Str. 33, Germany. everss@uni-muenster.de

Current Pain and Headache Reports

|May 17, 2007

Summary

Designing pediatric migraine drug trials is challenging due to high placebo responses. Crossover trials demonstrate better efficacy outcomes than parallel group trials for acute migraine treatment in children.

More Related Videos

Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Action Observation Training in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Action Observation Training in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Published on: August 9, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2026

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers

Published on: January 5, 2024

Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Action Observation Training in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Action Observation Training in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Published on: August 9, 2024

Area of Science:

Pediatric neurology
Clinical trial design
Migraine research

Background:

Clinical studies for acute migraine treatment in pediatric populations are limited.
High placebo response rates complicate the assessment of drug efficacy in children.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze the impact of trial design on placebo response and therapeutic gain in childhood migraine treatment.
To provide recommendations for future clinical trial designs in pediatric migraine.

Main Methods:

Systematic review and analysis of published acute drug treatment trials for migraine in children.
Comparison of placebo rates and therapeutic gain between crossover and parallel group trial designs.

Main Results:

Crossover trials exhibited lower placebo response rates compared to parallel group trials.
Therapeutic gain was found to be higher in crossover trial designs for childhood migraine.

Conclusions:

The choice of trial design significantly influences the observed efficacy of acute migraine treatments in children.
Future research on acute drug treatment for childhood migraine should prioritize crossover trial designs to mitigate placebo effects and better demonstrate therapeutic gain.