Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
Published on: July 30, 2019
Sampling species abundance distributions: resolving the veil-line debate
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA. chisholm@princeton.edu
This study reconciles ecological species abundance distribution (SAD) theories by examining sampling scales. It demonstrates that the log-normal distribution remains a plausible model, refuting claims based solely on sampling arguments.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Theoretical Ecology
- Mathematical Biology
Background:
- Preston's theory of species abundance distributions (SADs) is a foundational concept in ecology.
- Dewdney challenged Preston's veil-line concept, suggesting flaws in sample SAD analysis.
- Discrepancies exist regarding the interpretation of sample SAD shapes and their underlying distributions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To reconcile conflicting theories on species abundance distributions (SADs) proposed by Preston and Dewdney.
- To investigate the mathematical impact of logarithmic versus linear abundance scales on sampling.
- To re-evaluate the validity of the log-normal distribution as a species abundance model.
Main Methods:
- Mathematical analysis of sampling processes on different abundance scales (logarithmic and linear).
- Comparison of Preston's and Dewdney's theoretical frameworks.
- Derivation of new results concerning SAD sampling properties.
Main Results:
- Preston's and Dewdney's theories can be reconciled by accounting for the mathematical properties of sampling on logarithmic and linear scales.
- Sampling arguments alone are insufficient to reject the log-normal distribution as a plausible species abundance distribution.
- New insights into the behavior of sample SADs under different scaling assumptions were derived.
Conclusions:
- The log-normal distribution remains a viable model for species abundance distributions.
- Sampling methodology and scale (logarithmic vs. linear) are critical factors in interpreting species abundance data.
- Dewdney's critique of the log-normal distribution based solely on sampling is not universally supported.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Species and Reproductive Barriers
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...
Conservation of Small Populations
Conservation of Declining Populations
Speciation Rates
Distribution and Dispersion

