Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computed tomographic colonography: clinical value.

Philippe Lefere1, Abraham H Dachman, Stefaan Gryspeerdt

  • 1Department of Radiology, Stedelijk Ziekenhuis, Bruggesteenweg 90, 8800, Roeselare, Belgium. radiologie@skynet.be

Abdominal Imaging
|May 18, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advances in Imaging and Diagnosis of Emphysematous Cholecystitis.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

To Wait or to Act: How CT Colonography Can Improve Management of Colorectal Polyps.

Radiology·2024
Same author

The single coronary artery.

Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico·2023
Same author

Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery from the ascending aorta.

Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology·2023
Same author

The superdominant RCA with double PDA.

Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico·2023
Same author

When Aunt Minnie turns out to be a Zebra: distal bile duct adenomyoma stimulating pancreas head tumor.

Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas·2022
Same journal

Abstracts of selected papers from the current literature.

Abdominal imaging·2016
Same journal

How the radiologist can add value in the evaluation of the pre- and post-surgical pancreas.

Abdominal imaging·2015
Same journal

Erratum to: Hot spleen: hypervascular lesions of the spleen.

Abdominal imaging·2015
Same journal

Cross-sectional imaging, with surgical correlation, of patients presenting with complications after remote bariatric surgery without bowel obstruction.

Abdominal imaging·2015
Same journal

The ability of 18F-choline PET/CT to identify local recurrence of prostate cancer.

Abdominal imaging·2015
Same journal

T1-hyperintense renal lesions: can high signal predict lack of enhancement?

Abdominal imaging·2015
See all related articles

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) shows promise for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. While effective in experienced hands, widespread adoption requires addressing training, efficiency, and radiation dose concerns.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Gastroenterology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a valuable tool for polyp detection and has accepted clinical uses.
  • Its primary application is screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) in asymptomatic individuals.
  • Controversial results from multi-center trials have hindered large-scale acceptance for CRC screening.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the potential of CTC as a reliable screening tool for colorectal cancer (CRC).
  • To identify challenges and areas for improvement in CTC implementation for large-scale screening.
  • To discuss necessary advancements for efficient and cost-effective CTC screening programs.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing clinical data and multi-center trial results concerning CTC for CRC screening.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of technical aspects including radiation dose, imaging techniques, and software advancements (e.g., CAD).
  • Consideration of logistical factors such as training, cost-effectiveness, and management of extra-colonic findings.

    • Main Results:

    • CTC can be performed effectively for screening by experienced practitioners.
    • Key challenges include the need for intensive training, minimizing false positives, and efficient patient management.
    • Low complication rates (e.g., perforation) and the use of ultra-low radiation doses are crucial.
    • Advancements in scanning techniques, 3D visualization, CAD, and laxative-free protocols are promising.

    Conclusions:

    • CTC holds significant potential for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, particularly when performed by experienced specialists.
    • Addressing issues of training, efficiency, radiation dose, and lesion detection (including flat lesions) is essential for broader acceptance.
    • Further optimization, including laxative-free CTC, could enhance its role as a primary screening tool for CRC.