Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation via Colonoscopy for Recurrent C. difficile Infection
Published on: December 8, 2014
Bowel colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci after antimicrobial therapy for intra-abdominal infections:
Mark J DiNubile1, Ian R Friedland, Christina Y Chan
1Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA. mark_dinubile@merck.com
Abstract:
The impact of different antimicrobial regimens for intra-abdominal infections on the frequency of bowel colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) was examined in 2 randomized open-label trials of intra-abdominal infection comparing piperacillin-tazobactam or ceftriaxone/metronidazole with ertapenem. In these short-term studies, overall rates of bowel colonization with VRE were generally comparable after treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftriaxone/metronidazole, or ertapenem.
Insights
Different antibiotic treatments for intra-abdominal infections showed similar rates of bowel colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). This finding is crucial for understanding VRE spread and guiding antimicrobial stewardship in clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Microbiology
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are common and require effective antimicrobial therapy.
- The emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) poses a significant challenge in healthcare settings.
- Bowel colonization with VRE is a risk factor for VRE infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of different antimicrobial regimens on VRE bowel colonization.
- To compare piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftriaxone/metronidazole, and ertapenem regarding VRE colonization.
- To inform antimicrobial selection for IAIs to minimize VRE selection pressure.
Main Methods:
- Two randomized open-label trials were conducted.
- Patients with intra-abdominal infections were randomized to receive specific antimicrobial treatments.
- VRE bowel colonization was assessed after treatment.
Main Results:
- Overall rates of VRE bowel colonization were comparable across treatment groups.
- Piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftriaxone/metronidazole, and ertapenem showed similar effects on VRE colonization.
- No significant difference in VRE colonization frequency was observed between the regimens.
Conclusions:
- The choice of antimicrobial regimen (piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftriaxone/metronidazole, or ertapenem) did not significantly alter the frequency of VRE bowel colonization in short-term studies.
- These findings suggest that current common antimicrobial choices for IAIs may have a similar impact on VRE selection in the gut.
- Further research may be needed to explore long-term effects and specific patient populations.
Related Concept Videos
Treating Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcers: Antimicrobial Therapy
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Microbiota Modulation by Antibiotics
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Antimicrobials as Antidiarrheal Agents