Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Can we develop ethically universal embryonic stem-cell lines?

Ronald M Green1

  • 1Ethics Institute, Dartmouth College, 27 North Main Street, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755-3500, USA. ronald.m.green@dartmouth.edu

Nature Reviews. Genetics
|May 19, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Don't abandon 14-day limit on embryo research, it makes sense.

Nature·2021
Same author

When pregnancy is a research risk.

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics·2020
Same author

COVID-19 and Religious Ethics.

The Journal of religious ethics·2020
Same author

Are babies by design in our future?

Personalized medicine·2018
Same author

Neural Technologies: The Ethics of Intimate Access to the Mind.

The Hastings Center report·2015
Same author

Comment.

Xenotransplantation·2015
Same journal

Genetic origins and constraints of evolutionary innovation.

Nature reviews. Genetics·2026
Same journal

Single-cell four-omics with CHARM.

Nature reviews. Genetics·2026
Same journal

Molecular integration of seasonal temperature signals in flowering time control.

Nature reviews. Genetics·2026
Same journal

RBPscan measures protein-RNA interactions in living cells.

Nature reviews. Genetics·2026
Same journal

Revisiting retinal and macular degeneration in the genomics era.

Nature reviews. Genetics·2026
Same journal

How evolution builds three morphs from one genome.

Nature reviews. Genetics·2026
See all related articles

New methods for deriving human embryonic stem-cell (hESC) lines aim to avoid embryo destruction. These approaches face scientific, ethical, and political challenges, questioning their potential for broader acceptance in stem cell research.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Science
  • Developmental Biology
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Human embryonic stem-cell (hESC) research is ethically contentious due to embryo destruction.
  • Opposition stems from moral objections to the use of human embryos.
  • Alternative methods for hESC derivation are being explored to address these concerns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate novel methods for deriving hESC lines without harming embryos.
  • To assess the scientific feasibility of these alternative approaches.
  • To explore the ethical and political implications for broader acceptance of hESC research.

Main Methods:

  • Review of emerging techniques for hESC derivation.
  • Analysis of scientific challenges associated with each method.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of ethical and political viewpoints on embryo-sparing hESC research.

    • Main Results:

    • Several new methods for deriving hESCs without embryo injury have been proposed.
    • Each method presents unique scientific hurdles and unresolved ethical questions.
    • The potential for these methods to gain widespread acceptance remains uncertain.

    Conclusions:

    • Alternative hESC derivation techniques offer promise but face significant obstacles.
    • Further scientific validation and ethical consensus are required.
    • The acceptability of these embryo-sparing methods to opponents of current hESC research is yet to be determined.