Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Development of Amelogenin-chitosan Hydrogel for In Vitro Enamel Regrowth with a Dense Interface
Published on: July 10, 2014
Interfacial morphology of self-etching adhesive systems in dentin.
Luis Guilherme Sensi1, Fabiano Carlos Marson, Renan Belli
1Department of Endodontics, Prosthodontics, and Operative Dentistry, University of Maryland Dental School, Baltimore, MD, USA. lsensi@umaryland.edu <lsensi@umaryland.edu>
Scanning electron microscopy revealed that most self-etching dental systems create sealed interfaces. Optibond Solo Plus-Self-Etch demonstrated superior hybridization and resin tag formation compared to other systems evaluated.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Adhesive Dentistry
Background:
- Self-etching adhesive systems are widely used in restorative dentistry to bond composite resins to tooth structure.
- Understanding the interfacial morphology is crucial for predicting long-term clinical performance and durability of dental restorations.
- Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) provides high-resolution imaging for detailed analysis of microstructures at the tooth-adhesive interface.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the interfacial micromorphology of various self-etching dental adhesive systems bonded to human dentin.
- To assess the quality of hybrid layer formation and resin tag penetration using scanning electron microscopy.
- To determine the effectiveness of different self-etching systems in achieving a well-sealed and hybridized interface.
Main Methods:
- Human dentin disks were prepared and subjected to a standardized smear layer creation protocol.
- Five different self-etching systems (AdheSE, Optibond Solo Plus-Self-Etch, Tyrian SPE, Adper Prompt Self-Etch, One-Up Bond F) were applied according to manufacturer instructions.
- Composite resin was applied, light-cured, and specimens were processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation.
Main Results:
- All tested self-etching systems, except for One-Up Bond F, successfully formed sealed interfaces and hybridized areas to varying degrees.
- One-Up Bond F exhibited gap formation and inadequate hybridization at the dentin interface.
- Optibond Solo Plus-Self-Etch demonstrated a more consistent adhesive interface characterized by thicker hybrid layers, numerous resin tags, and lateral branches.
Conclusions:
- Optibond Solo Plus-Self-Etch yielded the most favorable micromorphological outcome among the evaluated self-etching systems.
- One-Up Bond F failed to produce satisfactory ultrastructural morphology at the dentin-adhesive interface.
- The study highlights significant variations in interfacial adaptation and hybridization among different self-etching adhesive systems.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
05:30Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
Published on: January 10, 2025