Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026
05:39
Acupoint Needle-Embedding Combined with Ironing Therapy for Postoperative Pain After Anal Surgery
Published on: June 23, 2023
Open compared with closed haemorrhoidectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
1School of Medicine and North Queensland Centre for Cancer Research, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia. yikhong.ho@jcu.edu.au
Techniques in Coloproctology
|May 19, 2007
Summary
Open versus closed hemorrhoidectomy techniques show similar effectiveness and safety for wound healing. Closed hemorrhoidectomy offers faster wound healing, while open hemorrhoidectomy has a shorter operative time.
Area of Science:
- Colorectal Surgery
- Surgical Techniques
- Wound Management
Background:
- Excisional hemorrhoidectomy is a common procedure.
- Managing surgical wounds is crucial for patient outcomes.
- Two primary techniques exist: open and closed hemorrhoidectomy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness and safety of open versus closed hemorrhoidectomy wound management.
- To analyze key outcomes including healing time, pain, and complications.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- Searched major electronic databases for studies on hemorrhoidectomy.
- Assessed outcomes such as operation duration, pain, hospital stay, and wound healing time.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in cure rates between open and closed techniques.
- Open hemorrhoidectomy was associated with a shorter operative time.
- Closed hemorrhoidectomy wounds healed significantly faster.
- No significant differences in hospital stay, pain, or complication rates were observed.
Conclusions:
- Open and closed hemorrhoidectomy techniques are equally effective and safe.
- Closed hemorrhoidectomy offers the advantage of faster wound healing.
- Further research is needed due to study heterogeneity and limited data presentation.