Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
[Different styles of influence tactics affect the likelihood of receiving support from peers]
Masafumi Kamada1, Katsuyoshi Fuchigami
1Depertment of Education, Okayama University, Tsushimanaka, Okayama 700 8530, Japan. tantaloz@ybb.ne.jp
Abstract:
This study examines how the use of influence tactics between peers affects the likelihood of eliciting social support. The participants (261 college students) were asked to imagine themselves in one of six scenarios, which described a hypothetical peer agent who usually uses specific influence tactics and the strength of the friendship. Then the participants rated the likelihood of supporting the agent, when the agent confronted a stressful situation. The result shows that the participants gave less spontaneous support to an agent who used hard influence tactics, such as restricting their freedom in choosing a course of action. Regarding emotional support, when they are in a close relationship with the agent, the participants gave the most spontaneous support to the agent using soft influence tactics, such as ingratiation. Participants gave steady socio-emotional support to agents using rational influence tactics, regardless of their relationship. This study also examined how influence tactics affect the participants' impression of the agent.
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
Persuasion Strategies
Routes of Persuasion
Impact of Individuals on Individuals
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...
Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity