Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The relative performance of indel-coding methods in simulations.

Mark P Simmons1, Kai Müller, Andrew P Norton

  • 1Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1878, USA. psimmons@lamar.colostate.edu

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
|May 22, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bridging quantum noise and classical electrodynamics with stochastic methods.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Vibrationally Induced Resonances in Lasing.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Coexistence of weak and strong coupling in a photonic molecule through dissipative coupling to a quantum dot.

Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany)·2025
Same author

Toward Single-Photon Detection with Superconducting Niobium Diselenide Nanowires.

ACS photonics·2025
Same author

Unlocking multiphoton emission from a single-photon source through mean-field engineering.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Genuine Quantum Effects in Dicke-Type Models at Large Atom Numbers.

Physical review letters·2025
Same journal

Phylogenomics, introgression, and demographic history of extant flamingos (Aves: Phoenicopteridae).

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2026
Same journal

The biogeographic and evolutionary history of Leiosauridae lizards reveal the influence of complex environmental and geological past dynamics in the Neotropical biomes.

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2026
Same journal

Rapid ecological speciation in gall inducers.

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2026
Same journal

Integrative systematics reveal the deep evolutionary origin and familial placements of the wirrahs (Teleostei: Acanthistiidae: Acanthistius) and the toadstool grouper (Teleostei: Trachypomatidae fam. nov.: Trachypoma).

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2026
Same journal

Geographic distance and climate-mediated landscape resistance explain the genetic differentiation of Rhopalus sapporensis across China.

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2026
Same journal

Integrative taxonomic revision of Uropsilus (Uropsilinae, Talpidae) combining genomic, morphological and geographic evidence.

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution·2026
See all related articles

For phylogenetic analyses, modified complex indel coding (MCIC) and simple indel coding (SIC) are recommended for treating gaps. These methods outperform other approaches, including 5th-state coding, when dealing with aligned gaps.

Area of Science:

  • Phylogenetics and Evolutionary Biology
  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Phylogenetic analyses often encounter gaps in sequence alignments, which can be treated using various methods.
  • The accurate interpretation of evolutionary relationships depends on appropriate handling of these alignment gaps.
  • Previous methods for gap treatment have shown varying degrees of success and robustness to alignment errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of 10 different methods for treating unambiguously aligned gaps in phylogenetic analyses.
  • To evaluate the robustness of these methods under both ideal and error-prone conditions (inferred alignments).
  • To identify the most effective gap-treatment strategy for parsimony-based molecular phylogenetic analyses.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized computer simulations to assess the performance of ten distinct gap-treating approaches.
  • Evaluated methods under ideal conditions (correct alignments) and simulated alignment errors.
  • Compared gap-coding strategies including 5th-state coding, simple indel coding (SIC), modified complex indel coding (MCIC), treating gaps as missing data, and excluding gapped positions.

Main Results:

  • 5th-state coding initially showed superior performance but was identified as a weighting artifact.
  • Modified complex indel coding (MCIC) and simple indel coding (SIC) demonstrated comparable and robust performance.
  • Both MCIC and SIC generally outperformed other indel-coding methods, treating gaps as missing data, or excluding gapped positions.

Conclusions:

  • Modified complex indel coding (MCIC) is recommended for coding unambiguously aligned gaps in parsimony-based phylogenetic analyses.
  • When the number of taxa (terminals) is too large for MCIC, simple indel coding (SIC) serves as an effective alternative.
  • Careful consideration of gap-coding strategies is crucial for accurate phylogenetic inference.