Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Proteomics01:33

Proteomics

A proteome is the entire set of proteins that a cell type produces. We can study proteomes using the knowledge of genomes because genes code for mRNAs, and the mRNAs encode proteins. Although mRNA analysis is a step in the right direction, not all mRNAs are translated into proteins.
Proteomics is the study of proteomes' function. It involves the large-scale systematic study of the proteome to denote the protein complement expressed by a genome. Scientist Mark Wilkins coined the term proteomics...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Extracting host-specific developmental signatures from longitudinal microbiome data.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

A mathematical kinetic model of memory in <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> spore germination.

iScience·2026
Same author

Oseltamivir aziridines are potent influenza neuraminidase inhibitors and imaging agents.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Analysis of microbiome high-dimensional experimental design data using generalized linear models and ANOVA simultaneous component analysis.

Frontiers in microbiomes·2026
Same author

Constraint-based modelling of metabolic dysregulation in Gaucher disease: mitochondrial dysfunction and disrupted cholesterol homeostasis.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases·2026
Same author

ACMTF-R: Supervised multi-omics data integration uncovering shared and distinct outcome-associated variation.

PloS one·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
10:37

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

Assessing the statistical validity of proteomics based biomarkers.

Suzanne Smit1, Mariëlle J van Breemen, Huub C J Hoefsloot

  • 1Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Universiteit van-Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Analytica Chimica Acta
|May 22, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a robust statistical validation strategy for biomarker discovery in proteomics and metabolomics. Combining permutation tests and double cross-validation enhances discrimination model reliability, especially in undersampled datasets.

More Related Videos

A Streamlined Approach for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Using Selected Tissue Regions
09:00

A Streamlined Approach for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Using Selected Tissue Regions

Published on: April 18, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
10:37

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

A Streamlined Approach for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Using Selected Tissue Regions
09:00

A Streamlined Approach for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Using Selected Tissue Regions

Published on: April 18, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Metabolomics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Biomarker discovery in proteomics and metabolomics often faces challenges with low sample sizes relative to the number of variables (undersampling).
  • Existing statistical validation methods may not be sufficient for reliable biomarker identification in such scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a comprehensive statistical validation strategy for discrimination models in omics studies.
  • To establish a reliable basis for biomarker discovery prior to biochemical validation.

Main Methods:

  • Integration of permutation tests, single and double cross-validation.
  • Incorporation of a novel variable selection method, rank products.
  • Application of principal component discriminant analysis (or any classifier) for classification.

Main Results:

  • The proposed strategy demonstrates high performance in an undersampled dataset (Gaucher patients vs. controls).
  • Double cross-validation achieved 89% sensitivity and 90% specificity.
  • Permutation tests confirmed the suitability of double cross-validation for error rate determination.

Conclusions:

  • The combined approach of permutation tests and double cross-validation provides a robust method for validating discrimination models in omics research.
  • This strategy effectively mitigates erroneous results common in undersampled datasets, improving biomarker discovery accuracy.