Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Muscles of the Shoulder01:23

Muscles of the Shoulder

The muscles surrounding the shoulder girdle, including the clavicle and scapula, primarily stabilize the scapula. This stable base allows other muscles to move the humerus effectively. Scapular movements often mirror those of the humerus and extend its range of motion. For instance, raising the arm above the head would not be feasible without simultaneous upward rotation of the scapula.
Anterior Thoracic Muscles
The anterior thoracic muscles include the serratus anterior, subclavius, and...
Knee Joint01:23

Knee Joint

The knee joint is the most complicated joint in the body. It consists of three articulations– two tibiofemoral and one patellofemoral. As is characteristic of synovial joints, the knee joint has a thin articular capsule that partially surrounds this joint cavity. Additionally, several ligaments, muscles, and cartilaginous structures support the movement of the knee.
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris group...
Ankle Joint01:10

Ankle Joint

The ankle is formed by the talocrural joint (crural = leg). It consists of the articulations between the talus bone of the foot and the distal ends of the tibia and fibula of the leg. The superior aspect of the talus bone is square-shaped and has three areas of articulation. The top of the talus articulates with the inferior tibia. This is the portion of the ankle joint that carries the body weight between the leg and foot. The sides of the talus are firmly held in position by the articulations...
Bones of the Lower Limb: Femur and Patella01:16

Bones of the Lower Limb: Femur and Patella

The femur is the body's longest and strongest bone spanning the thigh region. Its head articulates with the acetabulum of the hip bone to form the hip joint. A minor indentation on the medial side of the femoral head, called the fovea capitis, serves as the site of attachment for the ligament of the head of the femur. This weak ligament spans the femur and acetabulum and supports the hip joint. The narrowed region below the head is the neck of the femur. The inclination angle between the neck...
Development of the Limb Synovial Joints01:07

Development of the Limb Synovial Joints

Joints form during embryonic development in conjunction with the formation and growth of the associated bones. The embryonic tissue that gives rise to all bones, cartilage, and connective tissues of the body is called mesenchyme.
The mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into chondrocytes that form the hyaline cartilage, and later the cartilaginous model of the bone. This model further transforms into a bone. This process is known as endochondral ossification.
During development, the limbs...
Bones of the Upper Limb: Humerus01:19

Bones of the Upper Limb: Humerus

The upper limb consists of the arm, forearm, wrist, and hand bones. The humerus is the single bone of the upper arm region. Proximally, it has a large, spherical, smooth head that articulates with the glenoid cavity of the scapula to form the glenohumeral or shoulder joint. The margin of the head is the anatomical neck, a residual epiphyseal plate. Laterally it extends to form bony projections called the greater tubercle and the lesser tubercle. Next to the tubercles is the surgical neck, a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Head acceleration events are associated with tackler head contact and running speed during tackling in junior Australian football.

Science & medicine in football·2026
Same author

Accelerometry Insights Into Gym-Based Plyometric Exercises; Evaluating Metrics, Reliability, and Sensor Placement.

Journal of strength and conditioning research·2026
Same author

An Ensemble of Long Short-Term Memory Models to Automatically Detect End-Range Movement Patterns in Men's Professional Hard Court Grand Slam Tennis.

European journal of sport science·2026
Same author

Unlocking the potential of video-based markerless motion analysis to study world-class sporting performance.

Journal of sports sciences·2025
Same author

Training junior tennis players to increase knee flexion improves their service performance.

Sports biomechanics·2025
Same author

Exploration of a novel tackle mechanics framework in junior Australian football.

Journal of sports sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Comparison of Kinetic Characteristics of Footwork during Stroke in Table Tennis: Cross-Step and Chasse Step
07:19

Comparison of Kinetic Characteristics of Footwork during Stroke in Table Tennis: Cross-Step and Chasse Step

Published on: June 16, 2021

Shoulder joint loading in the high performance flat and kick tennis serves.

Machar Reid1, Bruce Elliott, Jacque Alderson

  • 1University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia. mmreid@cyllene.uwa.edu.au

British Journal of Sports Medicine
|May 22, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Tennis flat serves (FS) and kick serves (KS) show similar shoulder joint kinetics but differ in racquet velocity. This suggests both serve types may contribute to shoulder joint injury risks in high-performance players.

More Related Videos

Biomechanical Analysis Methods to Assess Professional Badminton Players' Lunge Performance
06:36

Biomechanical Analysis Methods to Assess Professional Badminton Players' Lunge Performance

Published on: June 11, 2019

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Comparison of Kinetic Characteristics of Footwork during Stroke in Table Tennis: Cross-Step and Chasse Step
07:19

Comparison of Kinetic Characteristics of Footwork during Stroke in Table Tennis: Cross-Step and Chasse Step

Published on: June 16, 2021

Biomechanical Analysis Methods to Assess Professional Badminton Players' Lunge Performance
06:36

Biomechanical Analysis Methods to Assess Professional Badminton Players' Lunge Performance

Published on: June 11, 2019

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Sports Science
  • Orthopedics

Background:

  • Tennis serves are complex movements involving the entire body.
  • Understanding the biomechanics of different serve types is crucial for performance and injury prevention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the full body kinematics and shoulder joint kinetics between the flat serve (FS) and kick serve (KS) in elite tennis players.
  • To identify biomechanical differences that may explain variations in racquet velocity and potential injury risks.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a 12-camera Vicon motion analysis system (250 Hz) to record 3D kinematics of 12 high-performance male tennis players.
  • Performed 22 paired Student's t tests with Bonferroni correction (p<0.01) to identify significant differences between FS and KS.

Main Results:

  • Flat serves (FS) generated higher peak horizontal, vertical, and absolute racquet velocities.
  • Kick serves (KS) were characterized by higher lateral velocities.
  • Shoulder joint kinematics and kinetics were similar between FS and KS, with variations noted in trunk and lower limb mechanics.

Conclusions:

  • Similar shoulder joint kinetics support the generation of varied racquet velocities in both FS and KS.
  • Comparable shoulder joint loading conditions in both serves indicate that repetitive performance of either may be relevant to shoulder injury pathologies.