Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
Staphylococcal Skin Infections01:29

Staphylococcal Skin Infections

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive coccus that resides harmlessly on the skin and mucous membranes of healthy individuals. When the skin barrier is breached, it can shift from a commensal to an opportunistic pathogen. This transition is facilitated by surface adhesins, such as clumping factor B and S. aureus surface protein G (SasG), which bind to structural proteins, including loricrin and cytokeratin, in the damaged epidermis. Protein A, another key factor, binds the Fc region of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Metabolism-based category formation for the prioritisation of genotoxicity hazard assessment for plant protection product residues (part 5): Acetyl CoA carboxylase inhibitors.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same author

A scheme for the assessment and definition of tolerable uncertainty in read-across for toxicological data gap filling.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same author

Matched molecular pairs-driven read-across for the prediction of genotoxicity of plant protection product residues.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2025
Same author

Development of chemical categories for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and the proof-of-concept approach to the identification of potential candidates for tiered toxicological testing and human health assessment.

Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2025
Same author

A systematic analysis of read-across within REACH registration dossiers.

Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2024
Same author

Metabolism-based category formation for the prioritisation of genotoxicity hazard assessment for plant protection product residues (Part 4): α-Chloroacetamides.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Eye Irritation Test (EIT) for Hazard Identification of Eye Irritating Chemicals using Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelial (RhCE) Tissue Model
10:13

Eye Irritation Test (EIT) for Hazard Identification of Eye Irritating Chemicals using Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelial (RhCE) Tissue Model

Published on: August 23, 2015

Global (Q)SARs for skin sensitisation: assessment against OECD principles.

D W Roberts1, A O Aptula, M T D Cronin

  • 1School of Pharmacy and Chemistry, Liverpool John Moores University, England, UK. d.w.roberts@ljmu.ac.uk

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research
|May 22, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for skin sensitization lack mechanistic robustness for broad application. Expert systems integrating mechanistic chemistry are currently the best non-animal approach for predicting skin sensitization potential.

More Related Videos

An In Vitro Skin Irritation Test (SIT) using the EpiDerm Reconstructed Human Epidermal (RHE) Model
21:16

An In Vitro Skin Irritation Test (SIT) using the EpiDerm Reconstructed Human Epidermal (RHE) Model

Published on: July 13, 2009

Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for the Quantitative Assessment of Acute Ionizing Radiation Induced Skin Toxicity Using a Mouse Model
06:21

Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for the Quantitative Assessment of Acute Ionizing Radiation Induced Skin Toxicity Using a Mouse Model

Published on: May 27, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Eye Irritation Test (EIT) for Hazard Identification of Eye Irritating Chemicals using Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelial (RhCE) Tissue Model
10:13

Eye Irritation Test (EIT) for Hazard Identification of Eye Irritating Chemicals using Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelial (RhCE) Tissue Model

Published on: August 23, 2015

An In Vitro Skin Irritation Test (SIT) using the EpiDerm Reconstructed Human Epidermal (RHE) Model
21:16

An In Vitro Skin Irritation Test (SIT) using the EpiDerm Reconstructed Human Epidermal (RHE) Model

Published on: July 13, 2009

Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for the Quantitative Assessment of Acute Ionizing Radiation Induced Skin Toxicity Using a Mouse Model
06:21

Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for the Quantitative Assessment of Acute Ionizing Radiation Induced Skin Toxicity Using a Mouse Model

Published on: May 27, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Chemical Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) are increasingly used for toxicological endpoints.
  • Evaluating the regulatory applicability of (Q)SARs is crucial for chemical safety assessments.
  • Skin sensitization is a key toxicological endpoint requiring reliable predictive methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and analyze (Q)SARs for skin sensitization.
  • To evaluate recent global (Q)SAR approaches against OECD principles.
  • To determine the most effective non-animal approach for predicting skin sensitization.

Main Methods:

  • Re-analysis of existing (Q)SAR data.
  • Assessment of global (Q)SAR models based on OECD principles.
  • Comparison of statistical vs. mechanistic (Q)SAR approaches.

Main Results:

  • Global "statistical" (Q)SARs demonstrated insufficient mechanistic robustness.
  • A high failure rate was observed with broad applicability statistical (Q)SARs.
  • Mechanistic chemistry is critical for accurate skin sensitization prediction.

Conclusions:

  • Expert systems incorporating mechanistic domains are the preferred non-animal method for skin sensitization.
  • Mechanism-based (Q)SARs within specific domains offer improved reliability.
  • Human expert input and experimental studies are necessary for compounds outside model competence.