Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026
Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Left atrial reverse remodeling in dogs with moderate and advanced heart failure treated with a passive mechanical
Valerio Zacà1, Robert Brewer, Sanjaya Khanal
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Heart & Vascular Institute, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA.
Background:
Assessment of global left ventricular (LV) remodeling is important in evaluating the efficacy of pharmacologic and device therapies for the treatment of chronic heart failure (HF). The effects of pharmacologic or device therapies on global left atrial (LA) remodeling in HF, although also important, are not often examined. We showed that long-term therapy with the Acorn Cardiac Support Device (CSD), a passive mechanical ventricular containment device, prevents or reverses LV remodeling in dogs with HF. This study examined the effects of the CSD on global LA remodeling in dogs with moderate and advanced HF.
Methods And Results:
Studies were performed in 24 dogs with coronary microembolization-induced HF. Of these, 12 had moderate HF (ejection fraction, EF 30% to 40%) and 12 advanced HF (EF < or = 25%). In each group, the CSD was implanted in 6 dogs and the other 6 served as controls. Dogs were followed for 3 months in the moderate group and 6 months in the advanced HF group. LA maximal volume (LAVmax), LA volume at the onset of the p-wave (LAVp), LA minimal volume (LAVmin), LA active emptying volume (LAAEV), and LA active emptying fraction (LAAEF) were measured from 2-dimensional echocardiograms obtained before CSD implantation and at the end of the treatment period. Treatment effect (delta) comparisons between CSD-treated dogs and controls showed that CSD therapy significantly decreased LA volumes (deltaLAVmax: 3.33 +/- 0.70 vs. -2.87 +/- 1.31 mL, P = .002; 7.77 +/- 1.76 versus -0.37 +/- 0.87 mL, P = .002) and improved LA function (deltaLAAEF: -6.00 +/- 1.53 versus 1.85 +/- 1.32%, P = .003; -2.39 +/- 1.10 versus 3.13 +/- 1.66%, P = .02) in the moderate HF and advanced HF groups, respectively.
Conclusions:
Progressive LA enlargement and LA functional deterioration occurs in untreated dogs with HF. Monotherapy with the CSD prevents LA enlargement and improves LA mechanical function in dogs with moderate and advanced HF indicating prevention or reversal of adverse LA remodeling.
