Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What's wrong with doctors.

Richard Horton1

  • 1London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

The New York Review of Books
|May 24, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review explores how physicians approach complex medical decisions. It examines the cognitive processes and diagnostic reasoning that shape clinical judgment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Overcoming the research to policy gap.

The Lancet. Global health·2019
Same author

India and Pakistan: a plea for sanity.

Lancet (London, England)·2019
Same author

Offline: Has global health lost it?

Lancet (London, England)·2019
Same author

Offline: UK citizens are losing the right to health-who cares?

Lancet (London, England)·2019
Same author

Offline: General practice-changing the laws of nature.

Lancet (London, England)·2019
Same author

Countdown Global Mental Health 2030.

Lancet (London, England)·2019

Area of Science:

  • Medical Humanities
  • Cognitive Science
  • Clinical Reasoning

Background:

  • This work reviews Jerome Groopman's "How Doctors Think," analyzing the cognitive and emotional factors influencing medical diagnosis.
  • It delves into the complexities of clinical decision-making, highlighting the interplay between evidence, intuition, and patient interaction.

Discussion:

  • The book examines the "black box" of medical thinking, illustrating how doctors arrive at diagnoses.
  • It discusses the impact of cognitive biases, uncertainty, and emotional states on diagnostic accuracy.
  • Groopman's insights are crucial for understanding the human element in medicine.

Key Insights:

  • Doctors' thinking is a complex process influenced by heuristics, biases, and emotional factors.
  • Effective diagnosis requires more than just data; it involves nuanced interpretation and critical self-reflection.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Understanding cognitive processes is vital for improving medical training and patient care.

    • Outlook:

    • Further research into medical education can incorporate insights on cognitive biases to enhance diagnostic skills.
    • Exploring the patient's role in the diagnostic process can lead to more collaborative healthcare.
    • The book serves as a foundation for future discussions on evidence-based practice and physician cognition.