Managing acute coronary syndrome: evidence-based approaches
1University of Sciences in Philadelphia, Philadelphia College of Pharmacy, Pennsylvania 19104-4495, USA. s.spinle@usip.edu
Insights
Quality improvement initiatives highlight gaps in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) guideline adherence. New data on bivalirudin and clopidogrel offer insights for optimizing patient care and reducing adverse outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Quality Improvement
- Pharmacotherapy
Background:
- Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) management require ongoing evaluation.
- National quality improvement initiatives and clinical trials provide crucial data to refine ACS treatment protocols.
Observation:
- The CRUSADE registry indicates suboptimal use of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors and clopidogrel in non-ST-segment elevation ACS, with opportunities for improved angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor prescribing at discharge.
- The ACUITY study explored bivalirudin's efficacy and safety, alone or with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, in high-risk non-ST-segment elevation ACS patients undergoing intervention.
- Recent studies demonstrate clopidogrel's benefit in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), including its use with fibrinolytic therapy.
Findings:
- Adherence to ACC/AHA guidelines for non-ST-segment elevation ACS is improving but requires further enhancement.
- Inappropriate GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor dosing in renal insufficiency increases bleeding risk, particularly in vulnerable populations.
- Bivalirudin offers a potential alternative to standard therapy in non-ST-segment elevation ACS, with bivalirudin alone showing a lower bleeding risk, though methodologic concerns warrant further investigation.
- Clopidogrel provides significant early and late benefits in ST-segment elevation MI, reducing mortality and morbidity without increasing bleeding risk when used with fibrinolysis.
Implications:
- Optimizing the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, clopidogrel, and ACE inhibitors is crucial for improving non-ST-segment elevation ACS outcomes.
- Further research and careful interpretation of ACUITY results are needed to define bivalirudin's role in ACS management.
- Pharmacists and clinicians must integrate the latest evidence on clopidogrel and other therapies into clinical practice to align with evolving ACS guidelines and improve patient outcomes.
Purpose:
To describe data and insights from a national quality improvement initiative known as Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines (CRUSADE), for managing non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS), as well as the findings and implications of Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY), a study of bivalirudin with or without a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor in patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS who were undergoing an invasive intervention, and the results of two recent studies of clopidogrel in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) that are not reflected in current ACC/AHA guidelines for managing ST-segment elevation MI.
Summary:
Data from the CRUSADE registry suggest that there is room for improvement in the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and clopidogrel during the first 24 hours of hospitalization in patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS who undergo early invasive cardiac procedures, and in the prescribing of angiotensin converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors at the time of discharge. Adherence to ACC/AHA guidelines for non-ST-segment elevation ACS has improved over time but further improvement is needed. Failure to reduce the dose of a GP IIb/IIIa for patients with renal insufficiency resulting in excessive dosing of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors increases the risk of major bleeding and is particularly common among the elderly, women, and patients with renal insufficiency. The ACUITY study suggests that bivalirudin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor is a suitable alternative to standard therapy for moderate- to high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS who are undergoing early invasive intervention, and bivalirudin alone may be preferred because of a lower risk of major bleeding. However, interpretation of the ACUITY results is complicated by numerous methodologic concerns, so the role of bivalirudin in managing non-ST-segment elevation ACS is still evolving. In patients with ST-segment elevation, clopidogrel provides an early benefit in reopening occluded coronary arteries and a late benefit in reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity without increasing the risk of bleeding. Clopidogrel treatment is warranted before as well as after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation MI who receive fibrinolytic therapy. Adding clopidogrel to fibrinolytic therapy and other standard therapy reduces mortality without increasing the risk of bleeding.
Conclusion:
Evidence-based guidelines provide recommendations for the management of ACS, but the pace of clinical research is rapid and current guidelines do not reflect the latest research findings. Pharmacists need to stay abreast of new developments and ensure that clinical practice reflects these developments.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina IV: Management
Angina V: Nursing Management


