Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing segmentations by applying randomization techniques.

Niina Haiminen1, Heikki Mannila, Evimaria Terzi

  • 1HIIT Basic Research Unit, Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Finland. haiminen@cs.helsinki.fi

BMC Bioinformatics
|May 25, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Remics: a redescription-based framework for multi-omics analysis.

Frontiers in cell and developmental biology·2026
Same author

SARS-CoV-2 infectivity can be modulated through bacterial grooming of the glycocalyx.

mBio·2025
Same author

AutoXAI4Omics: an automated explainable AI tool for omics and tabular data.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2024
Same author

Correction for Zhu et al., "Phylogeny-Aware Analysis of Metagenome Community Ecology Based on Matched Reference Genomes while Bypassing Taxonomy".

mSystems·2024
Same author

Development and evaluation of statistical and artificial intelligence approaches with microbial shotgun metagenomics data as an untargeted screening tool for use in food production.

mSystems·2024
Same author

Standardized multi-omics of Earth's microbiomes reveals microbial and metabolite diversity.

Nature microbiology·2022
Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SimMapNet: a Bayesian framework for gene regulatory network inference using gene ontology similarities as external hint.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Dual channel drug-drug interactions extraction based on cross attention.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

FeSseqdb: a curated sequence-level database and interpretable machine learning framework for identifying iron-sulfur proteins.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a framework to evaluate genomic sequence segmentation quality using randomization techniques. It demonstrates how to statistically assess segmentation accuracy, distinguishing significant findings from chance occurrences.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Numerous techniques exist for segmenting genomic sequences based on various biological features.
  • Evaluating and comparing the quality of these segmentations and features is crucial for biological insights.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present a robust framework for assessing the quality of genomic sequence segmentations.
  • To enable objective comparison between different segmentation techniques and biological features.

Main Methods:

  • Application of randomization techniques to evaluate segmentation quality.
  • Utilizing alternative biological features for sequence segmentation.
  • Statistical assessment of segmentation similarity against true segmentations.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated statistically significant similarity between some obtained segmentations and underlying true segmentations.
  • Identified segmentations where equally good results could arise by chance.
  • Applied the framework to isochore detection and coding-noncoding structure discovery.

Conclusions:

  • Introduced a novel framework for evaluating genomic segmentation quality.
  • Transformed quality evaluation from qualitative viewing to quantitative p-value generation.
  • Provided a statistically sound method for assessing the significance of genomic segmentations.