Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
Published on: January 9, 2016
Decision making as measured with the Iowa Gambling Task in patients with borderline personality disorder
Vegard Øksendal Haaland1, Nils Inge Landrø
1Department of Psychiatry, Sørlandet Hospital HF, Kristiansand, Norway. vegard.oksendal.haaland@sshf.no
Abstract:
Affective instability is a core dimension of borderline personality disorder. The somatic marker hypothesis suggests that emotions play a crucial role in decision making. In this preliminary study, decision making was assessed in individuals with borderline personality disorder. Patients with borderline personality disorder (n = 20) and healthy comparison subjects (n = 15) were tested with the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). The patients showed less advantageous choices on the IGT than did the healthy comparison subjects. The results could not be explained by indicators of general cognitive function or by symptoms of depression. These findings demonstrate that deficits in decision making in borderline personality disorder may manifest themselves in an ecologically valid neuropsychological test. Future studies should address whether those deficits are related to the behavioral characteristics of affective dysregulation and/or impulsivity, to the proposed dysfunctions and reduced volume of the orbitofrontal cortex and/or the amygdala, and to other neuropsychological functions.
More Related Videos
07:42An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
Published on: August 2, 2018
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Borderline Personality Disorder
Genetic and Environmental Contributions
Borderline Personality...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...