Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Delayed Intramyocardial Delivery of Stem Cells after Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in a Murine Model
Published on: September 3, 2020
[Regenerative therapy in patients with a revascularized acute anterior myocardial infarction and depressed
José Suárez de Lezo1, Concepción Herrera, Manuel Pan
1Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain. grupo_corpal@arrakis.es
Insights
Intracoronary bone marrow cell infusion improved ejection fraction in acute myocardial infarction patients. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) did not significantly enhance functional recovery in this study.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Regenerative Medicine
- Stem Cell Therapy
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) often leads to impaired left ventricular function.
- Distinguishing the effects of early revascularization and regenerative therapies on cardiac function is challenging.
- Patients with anterior wall AMI and ejection fraction < 45% represent a group with significant ventricular dysfunction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of intracoronary autologous mononuclear bone marrow cells versus systemic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on left ventricular function in patients with anterior wall AMI.
- To evaluate the efficacy of regenerative therapy in improving ejection fraction post-AMI.
- To assess the impact of stem cell mobilization via G-CSF on cardiac recovery.
Main Methods:
- Randomized controlled trial involving three groups: intracoronary bone marrow cells (Group I), systemic G-CSF (Group II), and control (Group III).
- Intracoronary infusion of bone marrow cells occurred 7 days post-AMI.
- G-CSF was administered subcutaneously for 10 days starting 5 days post-AMI.
- Left ventricular ejection fraction was assessed at baseline and 3-month follow-up.
Main Results:
- Group I (bone marrow cells) showed a 20% increase in mean ejection fraction.
- Group II (G-CSF) demonstrated a 4% increase, and Group III (control) showed a 6% increase.
- The improvement in ejection fraction in Group I was statistically significant compared to Groups II and III.
Conclusions:
- Intracoronary infusion of autologous mononuclear bone marrow cells is associated with improved short-term left ventricular functional recovery in AMI patients.
- Systemic administration of G-CSF for stem cell mobilization did not yield significant functional recovery benefits in this patient cohort.
- Regenerative therapy with bone marrow cells shows promise for enhancing cardiac function after myocardial infarction.
Introduction And Objectives:
It is difficult to distinguish the effects early revascularization and regenerative therapy have on left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study was an investigation into three groups of patients who had a revascularized anterior wall AMI and depressed left ventricular function (i.e., ejection fraction < 45%). The aim was to compare changes in left ventricular function between patients who received regenerative therapy and those who did not.
Methods:
Patients were randomly assigned to receive either an intracoronary infusion of autologous mononuclear bone marrow cells (Group I; n=10) or systemic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (Group II; n=10), or to a control group (Group III; n=10). In Group I, intracoronary infusion was carried out 7(2) days after AMI. Group-II patients received a 10-day course of subcutaneous G-CSF injections, 10 .g/kg per day starting 5 days after AMI. Ventricular function was assessed at baseline and 3-month follow-up.
Results:
A 20% increase in mean ejection fraction was observed in Group I, compared with increases of 4% (P<.01) and 6% (P<.05) in Groups II and III, respectively.
Conclusions:
Intracoronary infusion of mononuclear bone marrow cells in patients with AMI and poor ventricular function was associated with better short-term functional recovery than previously reported. However, mobilization of stem cells by G-CSF did not have a significant influence on functional recovery.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

