Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modified scoring criteria for the RBANS figures.

Kevin Duff1, W R Leber, Doyle E Patton

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1000, USA. kevin-duff@uiowa.edu

Applied Neuropsychology
|May 26, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cumulative Adverse Childhood Experiences and Multiple Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Children and Adolescents: A Population-Based Study.

Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress·2026
Same author

Diagnostic complexities of autism and psychosis: A commentary on the ANZJP GRADE guidelines for the management of schizophrenia.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
Same author

Managing in war, planning for peace: second report of The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on mental health in Ukraine.

The lancet. Psychiatry·2026
Same author

Initial physical health assessment for psychosis in Australia and New Zealand: 2026 recommendations.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry·2026
Same author

Estimating burden of disease attributable to child maltreatment using findings from the Australian Child Maltreatment Study.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2026
Same author

Coping with Climate Change: Correlates of Adaptive and Maladaptive Coping in Young People.

Chronic stress (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)·2026

Modified scoring criteria for the RBANS Figure Copy and Recall subtests yielded higher scores and reliability. Researchers should cautiously interpret low scores using standard criteria due to significant differences.

Area of Science:

  • Neuropsychology
  • Cognitive Assessment

Background:

  • Subjective scoring in visual construction and memory tests impacts reliability.
  • The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) is widely used.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare standard and modified scoring criteria for RBANS Figure Copy and Recall subtests.
  • To assess the impact of scoring criteria on scores, reliability, and age effects.

Main Methods:

  • Two samples were used: older adults and a mixed clinical group.
  • Standard RBANS scoring criteria were compared against a modified set for Figure Copy and Recall.

Main Results:

  • Modified criteria consistently resulted in higher scores than standard criteria in both samples.

Related Experiment Videos

  • High inter-rater reliability and no age effects were observed with modified criteria.
  • Modified criteria improved the alignment of Figure Copy scores with other RBANS performances.

    • Conclusions:

    • Significant differences exist between standard and modified RBANS scoring criteria.
    • Modified criteria offer potential improvements in reliability and score interpretation.
    • Clinicians should exercise caution when interpreting low RBANS Figure Copy and Recall scores obtained with standard criteria.