Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Contaminants and Errors

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

Random Error

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction

NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction

When magnetic nuclei in a sample achieve resonance and undergo relaxation, the signal detected in NMR is an approximately exponential free induction decay. Fourier transform of an exponential decay yields a Lorentzian peak in the frequency domain. Lorentzian peaks in an NMR spectrum are defined by their amplitude, full width at half maximum, and position, where the peak width is governed by the spin-spin relaxation time alone. In real experiments, however, the applied magnetic field is rendered...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Capillary electrophoresis for the screening and diagnosis of inherited hemoglobin disorders. Ready for prime time?

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2015

Same author

How to report results of prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin times.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2015

Same author

Screening Tests for Cushing's Syndrome: Urinary Free Cortisol Role Measured by LC-MS/MS.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2015

Same author

Microarray-based IgE detection in tears of patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis.

Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology·2015

Same author

Fetal Endothelial Remodeling in Late-Onset Gestational Hypertension.

American journal of hypertension·2015

Same author

Calcimimetic and vitamin D analog use in hemodialyzed patients is associated with increased levels of vitamin K dependent proteins.

Endocrine·2015

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model

Published on: October 31, 2010

Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later.

Paolo Carraro¹, Mario Plebani

¹Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera-Università and Azienda ULSS 16, Padova, Italy.

Clinical Chemistry

|May 26, 2007

Summary

Clinical laboratory errors decreased significantly between 1996 and 2006, with pre- and postanalytical phases still showing the highest error rates. Continuous monitoring is key to improving patient safety in laboratory testing.

More Related Videos

Studying Age-dependent Genomic Instability using the S. cerevisiae Chronological Lifespan Model

Studying Age-dependent Genomic Instability using the S. cerevisiae Chronological Lifespan Model

Published on: September 29, 2011

Merging Absolute and Relative Quantitative PCR Data to Quantify STAT3 Splice Variant Transcripts

Merging Absolute and Relative Quantitative PCR Data to Quantify STAT3 Splice Variant Transcripts

Published on: October 9, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model

Published on: October 31, 2010

Studying Age-dependent Genomic Instability using the S. cerevisiae Chronological Lifespan Model

Studying Age-dependent Genomic Instability using the S. cerevisiae Chronological Lifespan Model

Published on: September 29, 2011

Merging Absolute and Relative Quantitative PCR Data to Quantify STAT3 Splice Variant Transcripts

Merging Absolute and Relative Quantitative PCR Data to Quantify STAT3 Splice Variant Transcripts

Published on: October 9, 2016

Area of Science:

Clinical laboratory science
Patient safety research
Healthcare quality improvement

Background:

Growing emphasis on patient safety necessitates robust monitoring of laboratory errors.
Understanding error rates across the entire testing cycle (preanalytical, analytical, postanalytical) is crucial for clinical laboratories.

Purpose of the Study:

To monitor and compare laboratory testing error rates in 2006 with those from a previous study in 1996.
To identify the prevalence and distribution of errors across different phases of laboratory testing.

Main Methods:

A 3-month observational study in 2006 across four hospital departments (internal medicine, nephrology, surgery, intensive care).
Physicians and nurses reported suspected laboratory errors, with daily critical appraisal by a laboratory physician.
Error rates were compared to a similar 1996 study.

Main Results:

A total of 51,746 analyses were reviewed, with 160 confirmed laboratory errors.
The overall error frequency was 3092 parts per million (ppm), a significant reduction from 4700 ppm in 1996 (P <0.05).
Preanalytical errors constituted 61.9%, analytical errors 15%, and postanalytical errors 23.1% of the confirmed errors.

Conclusions:

Laboratory error rates have significantly decreased over the past decade.
Pre- and postanalytical phases remain the primary sources of laboratory errors.
Changes in the types and frequencies of errors within these phases indicate evolving challenges in laboratory testing.