Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rare coding sequence changes are consistent with Ecdysozoa, not Coelomata.

Manuel Irimia1, Ignacio Maeso, David Penny

  • 1Departament de Genètica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Molecular Biology and Evolution
|May 26, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neuronal microexons modulate arousal via the cAMP-PKA-CREB pathway in zebrafish.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Controlling for life-history traits in vertebrates reveals that effective population size does not affect mutation rate or genome size.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Deep conservation of cis-regulatory elements and chromatin organization in echinoderms uncover ancestral regulatory features of animal genomes.

Nature ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Role of CEBPa in trophectoderm competence installment.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Phenotypic impact of individual conserved neuronal microexons and their master regulators in zebrafish.

eLife·2025
Same author

The Biodiversity Cell Atlas: mapping the tree of life at cellular resolution.

Nature·2025
Same journal

The life history of recessive deleterious alleles as seen through the eyes of a honey bee (Apis mellifera).

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Severe bottleneck of ancient Homo populations: Insights from computational modeling and relevant fossil evidence.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Population Epigenetics: Deciphering DNA Methylation Diversity and its Implications for Health, Disease, and Evolution.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Genomic signature of repeated transitions to diurnality in spiders.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomic blind spots: The limits of UCE and BUSCO loci in the presence of gene flow.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

seqLens: Optimizing Language Models for Genomic Predictions.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
See all related articles

Rare genomic changes (RGCs) analysis challenges the Coelomata hypothesis. New genomic data suggests Ecdysozoa, not Coelomata, is the more accurate grouping for nematodes, arthropods, and deuterostomes.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular evolution
  • Phylogenetics
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Rare genomic changes (RGCs) are increasingly used in phylogenetic analyses.
  • A recent study proposed RGC-CAMs (rare genomic changes-conserved amino acids-multiple substitutions) to infer relationships between nematodes, arthropods, and deuterostomes.
  • The RGC-CAMs method initially supported the Coelomata hypothesis, grouping arthropods and deuterostomes, excluding nematodes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the phylogenetic relationships between nematodes, arthropods, and deuterostomes using new genomic data.
  • To investigate whether the rapid evolution of certain nematode lineages biases phylogenetic inference.
  • To test the validity of the Coelomata hypothesis against alternative groupings like Ecdysozoa.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of newly available genomic sequences from Nematostella vectensis (a basal metazoan) and Brugia malayi (a nematode).
  • Application of phylogenetic methods, likely incorporating rare genomic changes, to the expanded dataset.
  • Comparison of character support for different phylogenetic hypotheses (Coelomata vs. Ecdysozoa).

Main Results:

  • The apparent support for the Coelomata hypothesis was found to be an artifact of rapid evolution in Caenorhabditis nematodes.
  • Inclusion of additional species (Nematostella vectensis and Brugia malayi) significantly altered the phylogenetic picture.
  • The revised analysis yielded 13 characters supporting Ecdysozoa versus only 1 character supporting Coelomata.

Conclusions:

  • The Coelomata hypothesis, as inferred from previous RGC-CAMs analysis, is likely incorrect.
  • Phylogenetic relationships are better explained by the Ecdysozoa hypothesis when a broader range of species and genomic data are considered.
  • This study highlights the importance of accounting for varying evolutionary rates in phylogenetic reconstructions.