Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The evaluation of genetic tests.

Ron L Zimmern1, Mark Kroese

  • 1Public Health Genetics Unit, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.

Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England)
|May 29, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Personalized prevention of neurodegenerative diseases: scoping review and evidence gap map.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Biomarkers for Personalised Primary or Secondary Prevention in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Rapid Scoping Review.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025
Same author

A scoping review of the assessment reports of genetic or genomic tests reveals inconsistent consideration of key dimensions of clinical utility.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2025
Same author

The PROPHET project paves the way for personalized prevention in the future healthcare.

European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)·2024
Same author

Optimising Exome Prenatal Sequencing Services (EXPRESS): a study protocol to evaluate rapid prenatal exome sequencing in the NHS Genomic Medicine Service.

NIHR open research·2023
Same author

Towards implementation of comprehensive breast cancer risk prediction tools in health care for personalised prevention.

Preventive medicine·2022
Same journal

Marginalising prevention during Health Devolution in Greater Manchester? A qualitative study of the perceptions and experiences of public health professionals.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Smoking prevalence in Italy from 1993 to 2024: a trend analysis framed by public health policies and emerging consumption behaviors.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

The exposure of adolescent girls with/without disabilities to discrimination: cross-sectional analyses of nationally representative surveys undertaken in 37 countries.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Classifying healthcare facilities as predictors of COVID-19 mortality rates in US counties (2020-2021).

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

How conditions within immigration removal centres in the United Kingdom affect the mental wellbeing of detainees: a scoping review.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Double burden of malnutrition and body composition among ethnic minority children aged 5-16 years in Tra Vinh, Vietnam: a community-based study.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Scientific advances in genetics have spurred numerous genetic tests, but evaluation frameworks lag behind. This review highlights challenges in assessing genetic test clinical validity and utility for public health.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Rapid scientific advances in genetics and molecular biology have significantly improved understanding of health and disease.
  • This progress has led to a dramatic increase in the availability of genetic tests.
  • However, formal evaluation processes for clinical validity and utility have not kept pace with test development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current practices for evaluating genetic tests.
  • To identify limitations in existing genetic test evaluation methods.
  • To highlight future challenges in the field of genetic test evaluation within public health.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of current practices in genetic test evaluation.
  • Analysis of frameworks for assessing clinical validity and utility.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of public health implications and challenges.

    • Main Results:

    • The number of available genetic tests has grown exponentially.
    • There is a lack of standardized processes for evaluating the clinical validity and utility of these tests.
    • A framework for genetic test evaluation has been developed.

    Conclusions:

    • Urgent need for robust evaluation systems for genetic tests.
    • Addressing limitations in current practices is crucial for public health.
    • Future efforts must focus on establishing comprehensive evaluation strategies for genetic technologies.