Impact of packaged interventions on neonatal health: a review of the evidence
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Rachel A Haws1, Abigail L Thomas, Zulfiqar A Bhutta
1Department of International Health, E8153, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Insights
Evidence on neonatal intervention packages is weak. More large-scale effectiveness trials are needed in developing countries to reduce infant mortality and improve child survival.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Neonatal Medicine
- Global Health
Background:
- Neonatal mortality disproportionately affects developing countries, with most deaths occurring shortly after birth.
- Millions of annual neonatal deaths highlight the need for effective interventions, particularly in socio-economically deprived regions.
- Existing reviews focus on individual interventions, leaving a gap in understanding the impact of intervention packages.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review empirical data on packages of interventions for neonatal health outcomes.
- To evaluate the content, impact, efficacy, effectiveness, provider type, and cost of implemented intervention packages.
- To identify gaps in the evidence base for guiding public health programs.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of peer-reviewed journals and grey literature.
- Inclusion of studies reporting neonatal morbidity or mortality from packages of multiple, biologically plausible interventions.
- Classification of interventions by delivery period, service mode, and study design.
Main Results:
- 41 studies implemented intervention packages, including 19 randomized controlled trials; however, large-scale effectiveness trials were absent.
- Antenatal interventions focused on micronutrients, and intrapartum interventions on clean delivery; few studies included comprehensive packages.
- Interventions were often bundled for convenience rather than synergistic effects, with limited cost-effectiveness data.
Conclusions:
- The current evidence base for neonatal intervention packages is insufficient to guide effective public health implementation.
- Effectiveness trials at scale, tailored to local needs in developing countries, are critically required.
- Further research should focus on synergistic effects and cost-effectiveness of comprehensive neonatal intervention strategies.
Abstract:
A disproportionate burden of infant and under-five childhood mortality occurs during the neonatal period, usually within a few days of birth and against a backdrop of socio-economic deprivation in developing countries. To guide programmes aimed at averting these 4 million annual deaths, recent reviews have evaluated the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of individual interventions during the antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal periods in reducing neonatal mortality, and packages of interventions have been proposed for wide-scale implementation. However, no systematic review of the empirical data on packages of interventions, including consideration of community-based intervention packages, has yet been performed. To address this gap, we reviewed peer-reviewed journals and grey literature to evaluate the content, impact, efficacy (implementation under ideal circumstances), effectiveness (implementation within health systems), type of provider, and cost of packages of interventions reporting neonatal health outcomes. Studies employing more than one biologically plausible neonatal health intervention (i.e. package) and reporting neonatal morbidity or mortality outcomes were included. Studies were ordered by study design and mortality stratum, and their component interventions classified by time period of delivery and service delivery mode. We found 41 studies that implemented packages of interventions and reported neonatal health outcomes, including 19 randomized controlled trials. True effectiveness trials conducted at scale in health systems were completely lacking. No study targeted women prior to conception, antenatal interventions were largely micronutrient supplementation studies, and intrapartum interventions were limited principally to clean delivery. Few studies approximated complete packages recommended in The Lancet's Neonatal Survival Series. Interventions appeared largely bundled out of convenience or funding requirements, rather than based on anticipated synergistic effects, like service delivery mode or cost-effectiveness. Only two studies reported cost-effectiveness data. The evidence base for the impact of neonatal health intervention packages is a weak foundation for guiding effective implementation of public health programmes addressing neonatal health. Significant investment in effectiveness trials carefully tailored to local health needs and conducted at scale in developing countries is required.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome is...