Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

09:09
Description of a Swine Infant Model of Volume-Controlled Hemorrhagic Shock
Published on: November 3, 2023
Intestinal and gastric tonometry during experimental burn shock
Leopoldo C Cancio1, Toshiyuki Kuwa, Kotaro Matsui
1U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3400 Rawley E. Chambers Avenue, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-6315, USA. Lee.Cancio@amedd.army.mil
Summary
Ileal tonometry is more effective than gastric tonometry for monitoring end-organ perfusion during burn shock and resuscitation. This study demonstrates ileal tonometry
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Surgical Research
- Physiology
Background:
- Organ failure post-thermal injury necessitates improved end-organ perfusion monitoring.
- Gastrointestinal (GI) tonometry is explored as a method to assess perfusion during burn shock.
- Current resuscitation strategies aim to restore hemodynamic parameters and urine output.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical utility of GI tonometry in monitoring end-organ perfusion.
- To compare gastric versus ileal tonometry during burn shock and resuscitation.
- To assess the effectiveness of tonometry in guiding resuscitation efforts.
Main Methods:
- Male swine (n=11) underwent a 70% full-thickness burn.
- Resuscitation initiated at 6 hours with lactated Ringer's, titrated to urine output.
- Continuous gastric and ileal regional PCO2 (PrCO2) measured by air tonometry.
- Intramucosal pH (pHi) and PCO2 gap calculated every 6 hours.
Main Results:
- Gastric pHi, ileal PrCO2, ileal pHi, and ileal PCO2 gap decreased during shock.
- These parameters returned to baseline with resuscitation.
- Ileal tonometry showed greater magnitude and less variability in changes compared to gastric tonometry.
Conclusions:
- Ileal tonometry demonstrated superior performance over gastric tonometry in this burn shock model.
- Ileal tonometry may be a more reliable indicator of end-organ perfusion during burn resuscitation.
- Further research is warranted to validate these findings in clinical settings.

