Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Precipitation and Co-precipitation01:17

Precipitation and Co-precipitation

Precipitation and coprecipitation methods can be used to separate a mixture of ions in a solution. In qualitative inorganic analysis, ions that form sparingly soluble precipitates with the same reagent are separated based on the differences in solubility products. For example, consider the separation of Cu(II) and Fe(II) ions by precipitation as insoluble sulfides. First, copper(II) sulfide is precipitated by the addition of acidic H2S, where the dissociation of H2S is suppressed. Adding H2S...
Precipitation Processes01:12

Precipitation Processes

The experimental conditions in a gravimetric analysis should be optimized to maximize the particle size and purity of the obtained precipitate. Ideally, the concentration of the precipitating reagent should be low with effective stirring to maintain low relative supersaturation for the growth of large crystals. In homogeneous precipitation, the precipitant is slowly generated by a chemical reaction in the solution to avoid local reagent excesses. For example, urea decomposes gradually to...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model01:09

Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model

Drug response models describe how pharmacological agents interact with biological systems to produce measurable effects. Baseline responses are inherent physiological activities without a drug significantly influencing the observed pharmacological outcomes. Depending on the drug response model employed, these baseline responses may combine with the drug's effect in either an additive or proportional manner.Additive Drug Response ModelIn the additive model, the drug effect is independent of the...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Multicompartment Models: Overview01:14

Multicompartment Models: Overview

Multicompartment models are mathematical constructs that depict how drugs are distributed and eliminated within the body. They segment the body into several compartments, symbolizing various physiological or anatomical areas connected through drug transfer processes such as absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination.
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis00:59

Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis

Noncompartmental analyses offer an alternative method for describing drug pharmacokinetics without relying on a specific compartmental model. In this approach, the drug's pharmacokinetics are assumed to be linear, with the terminal phase log-linear. This assumption allows for simplified analysis and interpretation of the drug's behavior in the body.
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This relationship...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatiotemporal variability, atmospheric chemistry implications and health risk assessment of ambient volatile organic compounds in Central India.

Environmental geochemistry and health·2025
Same author

Characterization and quantification of atmospheric emissions of dioxins, dl-PCBs and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from municipal solid waste open burning in Southeast Asia.

Waste management (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Evaluation of PVC and PTFE filters for direct-on-filter crystalline silica quantification by FTIR.

Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene·2024
Same author

Environmental sampling for disease surveillance: Recent advances and recommendations for best practice.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2023
Same author

Contributions of non-tailpipe emissions to near-road PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>: A chemical mass balance study.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2023
Same author

Review of Filters for Air Sampling and Chemical Analysis in Mining Workplaces.

Minerals (Basel, Switzerland)·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses
11:19

Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses

Published on: October 21, 2016

Quantifying PM2.5 source contributions for the San Joaquin Valley with multivariate receptor models.

L W Antony Chen1, John G Watson, Judith C Chow

  • 1Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada, USA. lung-wen.chen@dri.edu

Environmental Science & Technology
|May 31, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This study used UNMIX and Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) to identify sources of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in California's San Joaquin Valley, finding secondary aerosols and residential wood combustion were major contributors.

More Related Videos

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
09:44

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon

Published on: October 16, 2018

Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers
10:29

Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers

Published on: March 21, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses
11:19

Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses

Published on: October 21, 2016

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
09:44

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon

Published on: October 16, 2018

Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers
10:29

Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers

Published on: March 21, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Atmospheric Chemistry
  • Air Quality Research

Background:

  • Particulate matter (PM2.5) poses significant health risks.
  • Identifying PM2.5 sources is crucial for effective air quality management.
  • California's San Joaquin Valley experiences high PM2.5 levels.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate source contributions to PM2.5 in the San Joaquin Valley.
  • To compare UNMIX and Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) for source apportionment.
  • To identify key emission sources during high and low PM2.5 periods.

Main Methods:

  • Application of UNMIX and PMF models to chemically speciated PM2.5 data.
  • Analysis of data from 23 monitoring sites in the San Joaquin Valley.
  • Factor analysis to identify emission source profiles and time series.

Main Results:

  • Six to seven factors identified by UNMIX; eight by PMF for each period.
  • Key sources include marine sea salt, fugitive dust, agriculture, cooking, secondary aerosol, motor vehicles, and residential wood combustion (RWC).
  • Secondary aerosol and RWC accounted for over 70% of PM2.5 during high-PM2.5 periods; PMF identified a unique zinc factor.

Conclusions:

  • Both UNMIX and PMF successfully apportioned PM2.5 sources.
  • Secondary aerosols and RWC are dominant PM2.5 contributors in the San Joaquin Valley.
  • PMF provided a more detailed source profile, including a specific zinc source, and results were validated through rigorous evaluation.