Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the setting of multivessel disease
M Balbi1, L Casalino, G Bezante
1Department of Cardiology, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Insights
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is standard for heart attacks. However, treating severe non-culprit lesions may prevent future blockages in certain situations, as supported by our case studies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Management
Background:
- Current guidelines recommend primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the culprit lesion in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
- Treatment of severe non-culprit lesions during primary PCI is generally not indicated (Class III indication).
Observation:
- The study presents two clinical cases where intervention on severe non-culprit lesions was performed alongside primary PCI.
- These cases explore the potential benefits of a more aggressive revascularization strategy.
Findings:
- Initial treatment of severe non-culprit lesions, in addition to the primary PCI of the culprit lesion, may reduce the incidence of delayed occlusions.
- This approach could be beneficial in specific clinical scenarios beyond current guideline recommendations.
Implications:
- Findings suggest a potential need to reconsider current guidelines regarding non-culprit lesion treatment in AMI.
- Further research into aggressive revascularization strategies for non-culprit lesions in specific AMI settings is warranted.
- These cases highlight a potential alternative management pathway for complex coronary artery disease presenting as AMI.
Abstract:
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit lesion is the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction, while treatment of the severe non culprit lesion is not indicated in the guidelines (Class III indication). More aggressive strategies that include initial treatment of the severe non culprit lesion may reduce the incidence of delayed occlusions in specific clinical settings. The two cases we describe support our point of view.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

