Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026
07:56
Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
Published on: September 19, 2019
A comparison of direct and spontaneous methods for assessing parental attributions
Charlotte Wilson1, Rachel Calam, Caroline White
1School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, Elizabeth Fry Building, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. charlotte.wilson@uea.ac.uk
The British Journal of Clinical Psychology
|May 31, 2007
Summary
Spontaneous parental attributions did not correlate more strongly with attributions after repeated child non-compliance. This suggests different measures may capture distinct aspects of parental cognition.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Parenting Studies
Background:
- Parental attributions are beliefs about the causes of child behavior.
- Understanding these attributions is crucial for effective parenting interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between spontaneous parental attributions and those made following child non-compliance.
- To determine if attributions change after repeated instances of non-compliance.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-six parents participated, completing two attributional measures.
- Direct attributions were assessed after the first and third child non-compliance vignettes.
- Spontaneous attributions were elicited via interview and coded.
Main Results:
- Spontaneous attributions showed no greater association with attributions after the third non-compliance compared to the first.
- The findings indicate a potential divergence between spontaneous and elicited attribution measures.
Conclusions:
- Current attributional measures may assess different facets of parental cognitive processes.
- Further research is needed to clarify the distinct constructs measured by various attributional methods.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
01:15Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
01:26Attribution
In social interactions, individuals frequently seek to understand the motivations and causes behind others' behaviors. This fundamental aspect of social perception, known as attribution, plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal relationships and guiding future actions. Attribution refers to the cognitive process through which people infer the reasons behind others' behaviors, allowing them to assess character traits, intentions, and situational influences.Attribution Theory and Its...
01:27Parenting Styles
Diana Baumrind's four parenting styles — authoritarian, authoritative, neglectful, and permissive — each influence children's socio-emotional development differently.
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative Parenting
This...
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative Parenting
This...
00:56Attribution Theory
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958). An internal factor is an...