Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.

Wolfgang Viechtbauer1

  • 1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA and University of Maastricht, The Netherlands. wolfgang.viechtbauer@stat.unimaas.nl

The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
|May 31, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of Quality of Life Between Patients with Chronic Unilateral Vestibular Hypofunction and Bilateral Vestibulopathy.

The journal of international advanced otology·2026
Same author

Back-transformations in random-effects meta-analysis-Impact and interpretation.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same author

Absence of a meaningful effect of intranasal oxytocin on trusting behavior: a registered report with pooled equivalence testing.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

What happens at night? Differentiating within-day and overnight affective inertia.

Cognition & emotion·2025
Same author

Pharmacological effects on 35% CO<sub>2</sub> panic induction: A meta-analysis.

Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Waterpipe use in Germany (2018 - 2024): Prevalence and sociodemographic differences in age of initiation.

Journal of health monitoring·2025
Same journal

Proficiency order invariance of MLE, MAP, EAP, and WLE in item response theory.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Bias and precision in true-score estimation.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Polychoric correlations under the assumption of elliptical latent traits.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Regularized reduced rank regression for mixed predictor and response variables.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

A multiple-choice SDT model for cognitive diagnosis models.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Modular item response and structural equation modelling via measurement and uncertainty preserving parametric modelling.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
See all related articles

The Q test offers reliable control over Type I errors in meta-analysis homogeneity testing, but large sample sizes are crucial for adequate statistical power. This study compares various homogeneity tests.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Meta-analysis relies on homogeneity testing to select appropriate statistical models.
  • The Q test is commonly used to assess homogeneity of effect sizes.
  • Variability in effect sizes can indicate heterogeneity, necessitating different analytical approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of the Q test against alternative homogeneity tests (likelihood ratio, Wald, score tests).
  • To evaluate Type I error rates and statistical power across different effect size measures.
  • To provide guidance on selecting appropriate homogeneity tests in meta-analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Monte Carlo simulations to assess test performance.
  • Compared the Q test with likelihood ratio, Wald, and score tests.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examined four distinct effect size measures.

    • Main Results:

    • The Q test demonstrated the tightest control over Type I error rates.
    • Adequate statistical power is contingent upon large sample sizes within the studies included in the meta-analysis.
    • Specific conditions under which test power is sufficient were identified.

    Conclusions:

    • The Q test is a robust choice for controlling Type I errors in homogeneity testing.
    • Researchers must consider the sample sizes of individual studies for sufficient power.
    • Understanding test performance aids in selecting the most appropriate meta-analysis model.