Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Neuromonitoring in operations in the skull base.

A R Møller1

  • 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA.

The Keio Journal of Medicine
|September 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Neuromonitoring techniques enhance surgical safety during skull base tumor removal. These methods help surgeons identify and protect critical nerves, reducing the risk of permanent neurological deficits.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acute high-intensity sound exposure alters responses of place cells in hippocampus.

Hearing research·2009
Same author

Tinnitus and pain.

Progress in brain research·2007
Same author

Is there a place for microvascular decompression?

Acta neurochirurgica·2005
Same author

Neurophysiologic basis for cochlear and auditory brainstem implants.

American journal of audiology·2002
Same author

Symptoms and signs caused by neural plasticity.

Neurological research·2001
Same author

Similarities between severe tinnitus and chronic pain.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2001

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Neurology
  • Surgical Technology

Background:

  • Skull base tumor removal poses risks to cranial nerves.
  • Identifying non-visible nerves in the surgical field is challenging.
  • Auditory system monitoring can assess neurological integrity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review methods for monitoring cranial nerve integrity during skull base tumor surgery.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of neuromonitoring in reducing neurological deficits.
  • To assess the feasibility of routine neuromonitoring in surgical procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Development of methods for monitoring cranial motor nerve integrity.
  • Application of brainstem auditory evoked potentials for auditory system monitoring.
  • Integration of neuromonitoring techniques into surgical workflows.

Main Results:

  • Neuromonitoring aids in identifying cranial nerves within the surgical field.
  • Brainstem auditory evoked potentials provide crucial data on auditory nerve integrity.
  • Studies indicate neuromonitoring reduces permanent neurological deficits after tumor removal.
  • Routine neuromonitoring does not significantly impede surgical procedures.

Conclusions:

  • Neuromonitoring is a valuable tool for enhancing safety in skull base tumor surgery.
  • The use of neuromonitoring can significantly decrease the incidence of postoperative neurological deficits.
  • Current neuromonitoring techniques are practical for routine surgical application.

Related Experiment Videos