Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Myocardial revascularization: surgery or stenting?
Sunny H Wong1, Song Wan, Malcolm J Underwood
1Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Insights
Surgical revascularization and percutaneous revascularization offer distinct benefits for obstructive coronary artery disease. This review examines current literature to clarify their respective roles and advantages.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide.
- Treatment strategies for CAD include medical management, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
- Ongoing debate exists regarding the optimal revascularization strategy for specific patient subgroups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically review and synthesize the current evidence comparing surgical revascularization and percutaneous revascularization in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease.
- To delineate the relative merits, indications, and outcomes associated with each revascularization modality.
- To provide insights into the evolving therapeutic landscape for managing complex CAD.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive literature search of major biomedical databases (e.g., PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library).
- Inclusion of randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and observational studies published within the last 10 years.
- Focus on studies reporting clinical outcomes, procedural success rates, and long-term follow-up.
Main Results:
- Percutaneous revascularization, particularly with drug-eluting stents, demonstrates comparable short-term efficacy to surgical revascularization in stable ischemic heart disease.
- Surgical revascularization often shows superior long-term outcomes, especially in patients with multi-vessel disease, diabetes mellitus, or reduced left ventricular function.
- Complex anatomical factors and patient comorbidities significantly influence the choice between surgical and percutaneous approaches.
Conclusions:
- The selection of revascularization strategy should be individualized based on patient-specific factors, including coronary anatomy, comorbidities, and patient preference.
- Both surgical and percutaneous revascularization have well-defined roles in the management of obstructive coronary artery disease.
- Multidisciplinary heart team discussion is crucial for optimizing treatment decisions in complex CAD cases.
Abstract:
There is current debate regarding the relative merits and roles of surgical revascularization and percutaneous revascularization for patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. This article reviews the current literature relating to this subject.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Myocarditis III: Medical Management