Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measuring human-error probabilities in drug preparation: a pilot simulation study.

P Garnerin1, B Pellet-Meier, P Chopard

  • 1Anaesthesiology Service, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Micheli-du-Crest, 24, CH-1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland. philippe.garnerin@hcuge.ch

European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
|June 2, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Game-based training to improve the compliance of hospital pharmacy operators with handwashing guidelines.

The Journal of hospital infection·2023
Same author

Association between burnout and stigma in physicians.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Development and application of a liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of 23 antineoplastic drugs at trace levels.

Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis·2022
Same author

Drug information leaflets improve parental knowledge of their child's treatment at paediatric emergency department discharge.

European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice·2019
Same author

Recipients with blood group A associated with longer survival rates in cardiac valvular bioprostheses.

EBioMedicine·2019
Same author

Prevention of potentially inappropriate medication in internal medicine patients: A prospective study using the electronic application PIM-Check.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2018
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of Ensitrelvir in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis with focus on viral clearance and RNA change.

European journal of clinical pharmacology·2026
Same journal

Comparing National Health Technology Assessment approaches and the new European Joint Clinical Assessment framework: The case of onco-hematological medicines.

European journal of clinical pharmacology·2026
Same journal

The efficacy of letrozole in the medical management of ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

European journal of clinical pharmacology·2026
Same journal

Detection of intravenous drug physicochemical incompatibilities in clinical practice: e-Harvis compared to reference tools.

European journal of clinical pharmacology·2026
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of doravirine/islatravir for the treatment of HIV-1: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with GRADE assessment.

European journal of clinical pharmacology·2026
Same journal

Critical analysis of digitalis glycosides: declining use but increasing poison-center exposure cases for digitoxin.

European journal of clinical pharmacology·2026
See all related articles

Small-scale simulations can generate measurable human-error probabilities (HEPs) for medication safety. These HEPs vary by individual and task details, crucial for improving probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) models.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare safety research
  • Risk management in medicine

Background:

  • Designing safe medication processes requires reliable modeling, often using probabilistic risk assessment (PRA).
  • A key limitation in PRA is the scarcity of data, particularly for human-error probabilities (HEPs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if small-scale simulations can generate measurable HEP data.
  • To assess the sensitivity of HEPs to individual practitioners and specific task parameters.
  • To inform the level of detail needed for PRA in medication safety.

Main Methods:

  • A pilot study involving 30 nurses and 28 anaesthetists.
  • Participants simulated medication preparation and drug calculation tasks.
  • Human-error probabilities (HEPs), their distributions, and dependencies were assessed.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Overall HEPs ranged from 3.0% (nurses, preparation) to 23.8% (nurses, arithmetic).
  • HEPs were significantly influenced by the practitioner group and task type.
  • HEPs demonstrated dependency on individual nurses and task specifics, but not consistently on individual anaesthetists.

Conclusions:

  • Small-scale simulations are a viable method for generating HEP data in the 10(-2) to 10(-1) range.
  • The significant influence of operators and task details necessitates their evaluation for advanced PRA.
  • Further research, including randomized controlled trials, is needed to quantify these influences.