Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Can history and exam alone reliably predict pneumonia?

A W Graffelman1, S le Cessie, A Knuistingh Neven

  • 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. A.W.Graffelman@lumc.nl

The Journal of Family Practice
|June 5, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of intrauterine transfusion techniques in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2025
Same author

The impact of caesarean scar niche on fertility - a systematic review.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2024
Same author

Long-term mortality in treated-to-target RA and UA: results of the BeSt and IMPROVED cohort.

Annals of the rheumatic diseases·2023
Same author

Impaired immunomodulatory effects of seminal plasma may play a role in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss: Results of an in vitro study.

Journal of reproductive immunology·2022
Same author

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on diagnostic pathology in the Netherlands.

BMC health services research·2022
Same author

Exploring gender differences among couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss regarding preferences for supportive care.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2021

Clinical prediction rules alone do not reliably diagnose pneumonia in primary care. Adding C-reactive protein tests offers minimal improvement for diagnosing pneumonia.

Area of Science:

  • Internal Medicine
  • Primary Care
  • Diagnostic Accuracy

Background:

  • Clinical prediction rules aim to aid pneumonia diagnosis and reduce reliance on costly tests.
  • Validation of these rules in primary care settings is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate existing clinical prediction rules for pneumonia in a primary care setting.
  • To assess the diagnostic accuracy of prediction rules, with and without C-reactive protein levels.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study of adults with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in primary care.
  • Collected clinical data and performed chest radiography.
  • Applied six existing prediction rules and evaluated their performance.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • 129 patients were included; 26 had pneumonia.
  • Only the model including C-reactive protein showed a significant area under the curve (0.69).
  • Positive predictive value was 47%, and negative predictive value was 84%.

Conclusions:

  • Clinical information alone is insufficient for reliable pneumonia prediction.
  • Elevated C-reactive protein levels provided limited additional value in diagnosing pneumonia.