Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The object-detection effect: configuration enhances perception.

D G Purcell1, A L Stewart

  • 1Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309-4401.

Perception & Psychophysics
|September 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Similarities and Differences in Interoceptive Bodily Awareness Between US-American and Japanese Cultures: A Focus-Group Study in Bicultural Japanese-Americans.

Culture, medicine and psychiatry·2020
Same author

Does smoking cessation improve health-related quality-of-life?

Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine·2013
Same author

Routine use of diuretics in very-low birth-weight infants in the absence of supporting evidence.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2011
Same author

DNA barcoding highlights a cryptic species of grenadier Macrourus in the Southern Ocean.

Journal of fish biology·2011
Same author

The new field for nurses.

Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia·2010
Same author

Wistar-Kyoto rats as an animal model of anxiety vulnerability: support for a hypervigilance hypothesis.

Behavioural brain research·2009
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Three-dimensional (3D) visual stimuli are detected and classified faster than two-dimensional (2D) stimuli. This indicates that object detection speed is influenced by the visual form of the stimulus.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • Line drawings can be perceived as either 3D or 2D figures based on line arrangement.
  • Previous research suggests target lines are more easily identified within 3D figures compared to 2D figures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if 3D visual stimuli are detected and classified more quickly than 2D stimuli.
  • To determine if stimulus form impacts object detection speed, similar to face and word detection.

Main Methods:

  • Participants identified and classified target lines within 3D and 2D line drawings.
  • Experiments utilized visual backward masking to assess detection speed.
  • Stimulus presentation involved both properly arranged (3D) and disarranged (2D) line patterns.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The 3D stimulus was detected more quickly than the 2D stimulus under visual backward masking conditions.
  • Classification of 3D stimuli was also faster compared to 2D stimuli.
  • Object detection speed was demonstrably affected by the visual form of the stimulus.

Conclusions:

  • Visual stimulus form significantly influences object detection speed.
  • 3D stimuli facilitate faster detection and classification compared to 2D stimuli.
  • Findings align with known effects in face and word detection, suggesting a general principle of form influencing object recognition.