Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-regression analysis of
Giuseppe De Luca1, Harry Suryapranata, Gregg W Stone
1Division of Cardiology, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Eastern Piedmont University, C.So Mazzini, 18, 24100 Novara, Italy. giuseppe.deluca@maggioreosp.novara.it
Insights
Coronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) reduces target vessel revascularization but not overall mortality. However, stenting offers mortality benefits for high-risk patients, identified by risk scores.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Coronary stenting is used in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) to reduce target vessel revascularization (TVR).
- The impact of stenting on mortality and reinfarction in AMI remains unclear.
- Previous meta-analyses have not included all available randomized trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct an updated meta-analysis evaluating coronary stenting benefits in AMI.
- To assess the effects of stenting on mortality, reinfarction, and TVR.
- To determine if benefits correlate with patient risk profiles.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases (1990-2006).
- Inclusion of all completed, published randomized trials of coronary stenting for AMI.
- Extraction of data on study design, stent type, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes by two independent investigators.
Main Results:
- Analysis of 13 randomized trials with 6922 patients; 50% received stents, 50% balloon angioplasty.
- Stenting showed no significant reduction in 30-day or 1-year mortality compared to balloon angioplasty.
- Significant TVR reduction with stenting at 30 days and 6-12 months; no difference in reinfarction rates.
- Mortality benefits of stenting correlated with patient risk profile at 30 days and 1 year.
Conclusions:
- Coronary stent implantation in AMI may be considered for TVR benefits.
- Stenting may reduce mortality in high-risk AMI patients.
- Validated risk scores can help identify high-risk patients who may benefit from stenting.
Introduction:
Although stenting has been shown to reduce the need for target vessel revascularization (TVR) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the benefits in terms of mortality and reinfarction are still unclear. Previous meta-analyses have failed to include all currently available randomized trials. The aim of the current study was to perform an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the benefits of coronary stenting for AMI in terms of mortality, reinfarction, and TVR, and whether these benefits correlated with the patient's risk profile.
Methods:
The literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE and CENTRAL) from January 1990 to September 2006. We examined all completed, published, randomized trials of coronary stenting for AMI. The following key words were used for study selection: randomized trial, myocardial infarction, reperfusion, primary angioplasty, rescue angioplasty, stenting, and balloon angioplasty. Information on study design, type of stent, inclusion and exclusion criteria, primary endpoint, number of patients, angiographic and clinical outcome, were extracted by two investigators. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.
Results:
A total of 13 randomized trials were identified and analyzed involving 6922 patients (3460 or 50% randomized to stent and 3462 or 50% to balloon). Stenting was not associated with a significant reduction in 30-day (2.9% versus 3.0%, p=0.81) and 1-year mortality (5.1% versus 5.2%, p=0.81), as compared to balloon angioplasty. However, a significant relationship was observed between patient's risk profile and mortality benefits from coronary stenting at 30-day (beta -0.63 [-25.4; -2.45], p=0.022) and 1-year follow-up (beta -0.61 [-15.9; -0.76], p=0.034). Stenting was associated with benefits in terms of TVR at both 30-day (3.1% versus 5.1%, p<0.0001) and 6 to 12 months (11.3% versus 18.4%, p<0.0001) follow-up, without any difference in terms of reinfarction.
Conclusions:
Among AMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty, coronary stent implantation, when anatomically and technically feasible, may be considered, in addition to benefits in terms of TVR, to reduce mortality in high-risk patients, who may be identified by the use of validated risk scores.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies