Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026
Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition
Published on: February 23, 2024
Bonded versus banded first molar attachments: a randomized controlled clinical trial
Philip Banks1, Tatiana V Macfarlane
1Burnley General Hospital, Casterton Avenue, Burnley, Lancashire BB10 2PQ, UK. philbanks_burnly@yahoo.com
Objective:
To compare the clinical failure rates of bonded first molar tubes with those of cemented bands during fixed appliance therapy.
Design:
Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
Setting:
Two UK hospital orthodontic clinics, February 2001-December 2004.
Participants:
Hospital waiting list patients needing fixed appliances (n = 110).
Method:
Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. Experimental group patients (n = 55) received single first molar tubes (n = 181) bonded with a no-mix chemically cured composite (Rely-A-Bond) after a 30-second etch. Control group patients (n = 55) were treated with bands (n = 186) cemented with Intact glass ionomer cement (GIC). First-time failures were recorded together with the time of failure. All patients were followed to the end or discontinuation of treatment.
Results:
First-time failures: bands = 18.8%; bonds = 33.7 %. Bonded tubes were more likely to fail [RR 2.4; 95% CI (1.4, 4.1)] compared with bands. Experimental group patients also had more bracket failures (P = 0.009), when analysed at patient level.
Conclusion:
First molar tubes bonded with Rely-A-Bond composite showed a significantly higher first-time failure rate than bands cemented with Intact GIC.