Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances01:29

Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances

Appearance is a multidimensional aspect of self-presentation that encompasses observable attributes such as clothing, grooming, speech, and nonverbal behavior. These elements are often strategically managed to align with socially constructed expectations in different settings. For instance, individuals tailor their appearance during job interviews, social gatherings, or athletic events to meet the perceived norms of those environments.Contextual Adaptation and Social SignalsThe research...
Principle of Virtual Work: Problem Solving01:13

Principle of Virtual Work: Problem Solving

The principle of virtual work is an essential concept in the field of mechanics and engineering. This is used to solve problems related to the equilibrium of a structure or system. It is based on the assumption that if a system is in equilibrium, the work done by all the forces during a virtual displacement is zero. This principle is applied by considering virtual displacements of the system and the corresponding work done by internal and external forces.
To apply the principle of virtual work,...
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Vigilance Tasks: Unpleasant, Mentally Demanding, and Stressful Even When Time Flies.

Human factors·2018
Same author

Spatial release from speech-on-speech masking in the median sagittal plane.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2012
Same author

Individual and team susceptibility to change blindness.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·2010
Same author

Target acquisition with UAVs: vigilance displays and advanced cuing interfaces.

Human factors·2006
Same author

The impact of hearing protection on sound localization and orienting behavior.

Human factors·2005

Related Experiment Videos

Characterizing team performance in network-centric operations: philosophical and methodological issues.

Robert S Bolia1, W Todd Nelson

  • 1Air Force Research Laboratory, 2255 H Street, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433-7022, USA. Robert.bolia@wpafb.af.mil

Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
|June 6, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Measuring team performance in network-centric warfare is challenging. Current methods fail to reliably assess situation awareness, workload, and error in teams, necessitating new research approaches.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Military Science
  • Cognitive Science
  • Human Factors Engineering

Background:

  • Network-centric warfare doctrine posits improved team performance through enhanced connectivity.
  • Key performance indicators like shared situation awareness and self-synchronization are central to this doctrine.
  • However, the doctrine lacks clear methodologies for measuring these team-level enhancements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the measurement of team performance within the context of network-centric warfare.
  • To identify deficiencies in current methods for assessing team situation awareness, workload, and error.
  • To propose directions for future research and methodological development.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of team performance constructs.
  • Review of existing methodologies for measuring situation awareness, workload, and error.
  • Examination of the applicability of individual-focused metrics to team performance.

Main Results:

  • Reliable and valid measures for team situation awareness, workload, and error are currently lacking.
  • Existing measures often fail when applied to teams, despite their validity for individual operators.
  • Deficiencies stem from philosophical and methodological flaws in the conceptualization of team-level constructs.

Conclusions:

  • Current approaches to measuring team performance in network-centric environments are inadequate.
  • Further research is required to develop robust measurement tools for team situation awareness, workload, and error.
  • Multidisciplinary approaches integrating social, physical, and biological sciences are recommended.