Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Improving medical practice: a conceptual framework.

Leif I Solberg1

  • 1HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minn 55440, USA. leif.i.solberg@healthpartners.com

Annals of Family Medicine
|June 6, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Primary care clinicians' perspectives on an electronic health record-integrated clinical decision support tool for opioid use disorder.

Journal of substance use and addiction treatment·2026
Same author

A learning health care community: integrating research and practice at scale.

The American journal of managed care·2025
Same author

Uncovering Four Types of Care Coordination in Primary Care.

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM·2025
Same author

Blood Pressure Medication Side Effect Symptoms and Patient Treatment Satisfaction and Adherence.

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM·2025
Same author

"Not just another client": Benefits provided by care managers to patients with mental health disorders in underserved areas.

Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare·2025
Same author

The Effect of Individualized Surgeon Comparative Feedback on Arthroplasty Outcomes: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2025
Same journal

Advancing Family Medicine Through Dyadic Electronic Medical Record Linkage in Dementia Care.

Annals of family medicine·2026
Same journal

Association of General Practice Continuity With Hospital Admissions and Costs: A Retrospective Study.

Annals of family medicine·2026
Same journal

Association of Advanced Access With Primary Care Performance: A Systematic Review.

Annals of family medicine·2026
Same journal

Death by Rousui in Japan: Rethinking Death, Diagnosis, and Care in an Aging Society.

Annals of family medicine·2026
Same journal

Navigating Changing Waters, Staying Anchored in Our Values at the 2026 ADFM Annual Conference.

Annals of family medicine·2026
Same journal

Multicomponent School of Caring Program to Support Caregivers of Patients With Dementia: A Quasi-Experimental Effectiveness Study in Primary Care.

Annals of family medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study presents a simple framework for practice improvement, emphasizing leadership, systematic change, and employee engagement for better healthcare quality. It guides front-line care providers and researchers in implementing effective change strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Organizational Behavior
  • Quality Improvement Science

Background:

  • Successful quality improvement (QI) initiatives require understanding complex organizational dynamics.
  • Lessons from 30 years of QI research and cross-industry literature highlight key success factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a straightforward conceptual framework for guiding and studying practice improvement efforts.
  • To provide a practical tool for enhancing healthcare quality and patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Synthesized personal experience from diverse quality improvement research studies.
  • Integrated relevant literature from the medical field and other industries concerning successful QI.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Organizational leadership, urgent vision, change management capability, and systematic change selection are critical.
  • A goal-directed change process, employee engagement, team learning, and consideration of context/barriers are vital.
  • A model proposing priority, change process, and care process content are necessary for measurable improvements, addressing barriers.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed framework can guide front-line care providers in transforming healthcare delivery.
  • It offers support for researchers developing interventions and recruiting practices for change initiatives.