Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Automation usage decisions: controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task.

Hall R Beck1, Mary T Dzindolet, Linda G Pierce

  • 1Psychology Department, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, USA. beckhp@appstate.edu

Human Factors
|June 8, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Combining performance feedback and scenario training effectively reduced automation disuse in operators. This approach addresses both appraisal and intent errors, improving decision-making in complex tasks.

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of human-machine competition on intent errors in a target detection task.

Human factors·2009
Same author

Sex differences in communication with close friends: testing Tannen's claims.

Psychological reports·2002
Same author

The perceived utility of human and automated aids in a visual detection task.

Human factors·2002
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Automation Science

Background:

  • Operator errors in automation use stem from appraisal errors (difficulty assessing optimal choice) and intent errors (disregarding known optimal choices).
  • Understanding these error types is crucial for designing effective automation training and support systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of performance feedback in reducing appraisal errors.
  • To assess the impact of scenario training on mitigating intent errors.
  • To determine the combined effect of feedback and scenario training on automation use.

Main Methods:

  • Operators received performance feedback on their errors versus an automated system's errors.
  • Scenario training guided operators through optimal decision-making processes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants made choices between manual operation and automation after training.

    • Main Results:

    • High disuse rates (84%) were observed without specific training interventions.
    • Performance feedback alone did not significantly reduce disuse, with 55% of operators still avoiding automation.
    • Combining performance feedback and scenario training significantly decreased disuse rates to 29%.

    Conclusions:

    • A combined approach of performance feedback and scenario training is superior to either intervention alone in reducing automation disuse.
    • Operator training should integrate methods to address both appraisal and intent errors for optimal automation utilization.