Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026
09:12
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
Physical aggression as a function of perceived fighting ability and provocation: an experimental investigation
1Department of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK. jarcher@uclan.ac.uk
Aggressive Behavior
|June 8, 2007
Summary
Young men are less likely to respond to insults with physical aggression when their Resource Holding Power (RHP) is high. High provocation, however, can increase aggression, especially when RHP is also high, leading to delayed aggression.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Evolutionary Psychology
Background:
- Aggression is a complex behavior influenced by social and situational factors.
- Resource Holding Power (RHP) is a theoretical construct representing an individual's ability to successfully defend resources.
- Understanding factors that modulate aggression is crucial for social and clinical psychology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of Resource Holding Power (RHP) and provocation on aggression in young adults.
- To examine how different levels of RHP cues (size, allies, reputation) affect responses to insults.
- To explore the relationship between provocation, RHP, and direct versus delayed aggressive responses.
Main Methods:
- Three studies were conducted involving hypothetical scenarios in a bar setting.
- Participants rated their likelihood of responding aggressively to various provocations under different RHP conditions.
- Manipulations included RHP cues, provocation levels, and response options (direct vs. delayed aggression).
Main Results:
- Increased RHP cues significantly decreased the likelihood of physical aggression in response to insults among teenage men.
- Insulting a partner was rated as the most provoking scenario.
- Direct aggression increased with provocation and decreased with RHP; delayed aggression was highest with high provocation and high RHP.
Conclusions:
- RHP plays a significant role in modulating aggressive responses, particularly direct physical aggression.
- Provocation remains a key driver of aggression, with high provocation potentially leading to delayed or indirect aggression, especially in high RHP individuals.
- Findings support theoretical models of aggressive motivation, highlighting the interplay between perceived power and situational triggers.
Related Concept Videos
01:47Aggression
Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for hire...
01:21Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation
Affiliation motivation is the intrinsic desire to connect with others and belong to a social group, which plays a crucial role in forming and maintaining personal relationships. This type of motivation is essential for psychological well-being, as it provides individuals with a sense of community and support. An example of this is a student who joins a study group in order to feel a sense of connection. People with high affiliation motivation actively seek social approval, take satisfaction in...
02:04Bullying
A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is bullying.
04:49Robbers Cave
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
01:28Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
01:14Agonism and Antagonism: Quantification
When drugs are administered, they can elicit either an agonist or antagonist effect on the body. Agonism occurs when a drug activates a specific receptor, triggering a biological response. On the other hand, antagonism happens when a drug binds to the same receptors but blocks their activation, thereby preventing a biological response.
To quantify these effects, researchers use a dose-response curve, which provides valuable information about the potency and efficacy of a drug. Potency refers to...
To quantify these effects, researchers use a dose-response curve, which provides valuable information about the potency and efficacy of a drug. Potency refers to...