Chemoinformatic analysis of NCI preclinical tumor data: evaluating compound efficacy from mouse xenograft data,

Anders Wallqvist1, Ruili Huang, David G Covell

  • 1Laboratory of Computational Technologies, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., NCI-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland 21702, USA. wallqvist@ncifcrf.gov

Insights

Chemoinformatic analysis of tumor xenografts reveals that compound chemistry and in vitro cell growth inhibition are key predictors of efficacy and toxicity. This approach effectively identifies promising oncology drug candidates with improved therapeutic potential.

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry and pharmacology
  • Translational oncology research
  • Drug discovery and development

Background:

  • Human tumor xenografts are crucial preclinical models for evaluating anti-cancer drug efficacy and toxicity.
  • Predicting xenograft outcomes remains challenging, necessitating advanced analytical approaches.
  • Chemoinformatics offers powerful tools for analyzing complex biological and chemical data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To perform a chemoinformatic examination of NCI human tumor xenograft data.
  • To explore relationships between small molecules, treatment, efficacy (tumor weight reduction, survival time increase), and toxicity.
  • To develop predictive models for xenograft endpoints and identify key predictive factors.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized NCI public human tumor xenograft data for chemoinformatic analysis.
  • Defined efficacy endpoints (tumor weight reduction, survival time increase) and a toxicity measure (survival advantage).
  • Constructed linear predictive models using treatment modality, chemoinformatic descriptors, and NCI-60 cell assay data; validated using cross-validation and ROC analysis.

Main Results:

  • Successfully constructed predictive linear models for xenograft endpoints with good predictive power (0.67 < r(2) < or = 0.74).
  • Chemoinformatic descriptors and in vitro cell growth inhibition were stronger predictors of xenograft outcome than treatment modality alone.
  • Achieved a 70% positive predictive value in distinguishing FDA-approved oncology agents from tested compounds.

Conclusions:

  • Chemoinformatic analysis integrating xenograft data and in vitro preclinical testing is effective for identifying drug candidates with superior efficacy and reduced toxicity.
  • Strong relationships were found between xenograft efficacy and biological pathways associated with correlated mRNA expressions.
  • This approach aids in understanding compound mechanisms of action and optimizing drug development strategies.