Are universal standards for optimal infant growth appropriate? Evidence from a Hong Kong Chinese birth cohort
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
L L Hui1, C M Schooling, B J Cowling
1The University of Hong Kong, Department of Community Medicine, 5/F William MW Mong Block, Room 5-21, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Insights
Hong Kong infants show similar weight to World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards but are shorter in height. This suggests universal infant growth standards may not fit all populations due to factors like epigenetic constraints.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Human Growth and Development
- Public Health
Background:
- The World Health Organization (WHO) established new optimal infant growth standards in 2006.
- Assessing the applicability of these universal standards to diverse populations is crucial for accurate growth monitoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the general applicability of the WHO 2006 optimal infant growth standards.
- To compare WHO growth standards with infant growth patterns in a Hong Kong Chinese population.
Main Methods:
- Data collected from over 7,400 infants born in Hong Kong in April/May 1997.
- Weight, length, and height measurements taken at various developmental milestones.
- Age and sex-specific z-scores calculated against WHO growth standards for term singletons.
Main Results:
- Infant weight for age closely aligned with WHO 50th percentile before 3 years.
- Hong Kong toddlers were, on average, shorter than WHO standards at 3 years (z-scores of -0.34 for boys, -0.38 for girls).
- Analysis of a subset meeting WHO healthy infant criteria yielded similar height discrepancies.
Conclusions:
- Hong Kong Chinese toddlers exhibit shorter stature compared to WHO growth standards.
- Potential factors include epigenetic constraints and rapid epidemiological transition impacting genetic height potential.
- Universal infant growth standards may require population-specific considerations.
Objective:
In 2006 the World Health Organization (WHO) published new optimal growth standards for all healthy infants worldwide. To assess their general applicability to a recently transitioned Chinese population, we compared them with infant growth patterns in a representative sample of Hong Kong infants.
Design And Settings:
Weight at birth and at 1, 3, 9, 12, 18 and 36 months, length at 3 and 9 months and height at 36 months were obtained for over 80% of all infants born in April and May 1997 (3880 boys and 3536 girls). Age and sex specific z scores were calculated relative to the WHO growth standards for term singletons.
Results:
Weight for age was close to the 50th percentile of the WHO growth standards for both boys (mean z score: 0.00) and girls (0.04) at most time points before 3 years of age. However, our participants were shorter at 3 years, where the z scores in height were -0.34 and -0.38 for boys and girls, respectively. Restricting the analysis to a subset matching the WHO criteria for healthy infants without restrictions on growth gave similar results.
Conclusions:
Although the WHO study group concluded there was a striking similarity in length/height among different populations, Hong Kong Chinese toddlers are, on average, shorter. Epigenetic constraints on growth coupled with the rapid epidemiological transition in Hong Kong may not have allowed sufficient generations for infants and children to reach their full genetic height potential, and with it the WHO standards. A universal infant growth standard may not be appropriate across all populations.
Related Concept Videos
Nature and Nurture
Regression Toward the Mean
Signs of Puberty
Oxygen Requirements and Growth Patterns
Development of Human Microbiota