Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in the Dorsal Skin of Hamsters: a Useful Model for the Screening of Antileishmanial Drugs
Published on: April 21, 2012
Parenteral aminosidine is not effective for Peruvian mucocutaneous leishmaniasis
Alejandro Llanos-Cuentas1, Juan Echevarria, Carlos Seas
1Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander Von Humboldt, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru. allanos@upch.edu.pe
Abstract:
Few therapeutic options are available for mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL). We conducted a randomized open trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of parenteral aminosidine sulphate (AS) 14 mg/kg/d for 21 days compared with intravenous meglumine antimonate (MA) 20 mg/kg/d for 28 days in patients with moderate MCL in Cuzco, Peru. Cure was defined as complete healing with re-epithelialization within 1 year of follow-up. The trial was stopped after 38 patients were enrolled (17 in the MA group and 21 in the AS group) because of marked differences in response. Study groups were comparable in baseline characteristics. Cure rates were 0/21 in the AS group compared with 8/17 (47%, 95% confidence interval: 23-71%) in the MA group (P < 0.001). Side effects and laboratory abnormalities were mild in both groups. We conclude that parenteral AS given on its own is not effective for MCL in Peru.
Insights
Parenteral aminosidine sulphate (AS) is not effective for treating mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL). In a trial comparing AS to meglumine antimonate (MA), no patients treated with AS were cured, while 47% of those on MA showed improvement.
Area of Science:
- Tropical medicine
- Infectious diseases
- Parasitology
Background:
- Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL) presents limited therapeutic options.
- There is a need for effective and safe treatments for MCL.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of parenteral aminosidine sulphate (AS) compared to intravenous meglumine antimonate (MA) for moderate MCL.
- To determine cure rates and adverse events in patients treated with AS versus MA.
Main Methods:
- A randomized open trial was conducted in Cuzco, Peru.
- 38 patients with moderate MCL were enrolled: 21 received parenteral AS (14 mg/kg/d for 21 days) and 17 received intravenous MA (20 mg/kg/d for 28 days).
- Cure was defined as complete healing with re-epithelialization within 1 year.
Main Results:
- The trial was stopped early due to significant differences in response.
- Cure rates were 0% (0/21) in the AS group compared to 47% (8/17) in the MA group (P < 0.001).
- Side effects and laboratory abnormalities were mild in both treatment groups.
Conclusions:
- Parenteral aminosidine sulphate monotherapy is ineffective for treating mucocutaneous leishmaniasis in Peru.
- Intravenous meglumine antimonate demonstrated significant efficacy in this patient population.
- Further research into effective MCL treatments is warranted.
More Related Videos
12:02An Efficient Method for the Synthesis of Peptoids with Mixed Lysine-type/Arginine-type Monomers and Evaluation of Their Anti-leishmanial Activity
Published on: November 2, 2016
08:48Development of a Backbone Cyclic Peptide Library as Potential Antiparasitic Therapeutics Using Microwave Irradiation
Published on: January 26, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Antiprotozoal Agents
Leishmaniasis
Anthelminthic Agents
Physical Properties of Amines
Inhibitors of Bacterial Protein Synthesis
Local Anesthetics: Pharmacokinetics