Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Reconsidering formative measurement.

Roy D Howell1, Einar Breivik, James B Wilcox

  • 1Marketing Area, Rawls College of Business, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-2101, USA. roy.howell@ttu.edu

Psychological Methods
|June 15, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Bayesian evaluation for latent variable models: A tutorial on computing information criteria and bayes factors with the r package bleval.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A stochastic block prior for clustering in graphical models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Three-level vector autoregressive models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Scaling cognitive modeling to big data: A deep learning approach to studying individual differences in evidence accumulation model parameters.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Best practices in multilevel modeling for within-cluster group comparisons: An evaluation of coding strategies reflecting group composition and heterogeneity.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A unified framework for psychometrics in experimental psychology: The standardized generalized hierarchical factor model.

Psychological methods·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Formative measurement, an alternative to reflective measurement, presents interpretational challenges. Researchers should prioritize reflective measurement due to these complexities and potential confounding issues.

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Measurement Theory
  • Social Sciences

Background:

  • The relationship between observable indicators and latent constructs is central to measurement.
  • Formative measurement models, where indicators cause the construct, are increasingly used.
  • Existing research often focuses on reflective measurement, where constructs cause indicators.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine formative measurement in theory-testing research.
  • To evaluate the potential for interpretational confounding in formative models.
  • To assess the suitability of formative constructs as point variables in larger models.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of formative and reflective measurement.
  • Examination of issues like interpretational confounding.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of construct functioning within broader theoretical frameworks.

    • Main Results:

    • Formative measurement introduces unique challenges compared to reflective measurement.
    • Interpretational confounding is a significant concern in formative measurement.
    • Formative constructs may be less suitable as point variables than reflective ones.

    Conclusions:

    • Formative measurement is not as attractive as reflective measurement.
    • Researchers should prefer reflective measurement whenever possible.
    • Guidelines are provided for utilizing existing formative measures.