Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating bias in validity studies of developmental/behavioral screening tests.

Bonnie W Camp1

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80222, USA. campbw@msn.com

Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics : JDBP
|June 15, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Considerations for Using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire.

JAMA pediatrics·2026
Same author

Using the Ages & Stages Questionnaire to assess later effects of an infant intervention promoting language in primary care.

BMC pediatrics·2023
Same author

Using Finger Puppets in the Primary Care Setting to Support Caregivers Talking With Their Infants: A Feasibility Pilot Study.

Clinical pediatrics·2020
Same author

Cumulative risk, the cognitive home environment and vocabulary in early childhood.

Child: care, health and development·2019
Same author

Combining Two Developmental Screening Tests to Improve Predictive Accuracy.

Academic pediatrics·2019
Same author

The Impact of Cumulative Sociodemographic Risk Factors on the Home Environment and Vocabulary in Early Childhood.

Advances in pediatrics·2017

Validity studies for developmental screening tests often overlook biases like small samples and verification bias. Addressing these issues is crucial for accurate test application in diverse settings.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Epidemiology

Background:

  • Validity studies are essential for evaluating developmental and behavioral screening tests.
  • Overlooked sources of bias can significantly impact the reliability and applicability of these tests.
  • Incomplete reporting of study methodologies and results is a common issue in the literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and describe six commonly overlooked sources of bias in developmental/behavioral screening test validity studies.
  • To analyze how these biases can affect the interpretation and application of screening test results.
  • To provide a framework for critically appraising the quality of validity studies.

Main Methods:

  • The commentary outlines six potential problems and sources of bias: small sample sizes, verification bias, inappropriate/non-equivalent test bias, procedural bias, incomplete reporting, and spectrum bias.

Related Experiment Videos

  • These identified biases are then applied to a case review of a comprehensive screening test validity study.
  • The analysis focuses on how methodological limitations and reporting gaps influence study outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • Small sample sizes can lead to unstable estimates of test validity.
    • Verification bias, where the reference standard is influenced by the screening test, distorts accuracy measures.
    • Inappropriate or non-equivalent comparison tests and procedural variations introduce further bias.
    • Incomplete reporting hinders reproducibility and critical evaluation.
    • Spectrum bias, arising from the selection of study populations, affects generalizability.

    Conclusions:

    • Awareness and mitigation of these six biases are critical for improving the quality of developmental/behavioral screening test validity research.
    • Accurate assessment of screening test validity requires careful consideration of potential biases in study design and reporting.
    • Improved reporting standards and critical appraisal are necessary to ensure the appropriate application of screening tests in various clinical and educational settings.