Related Concept Videos
01:18Methods of Documentation I: Source-Oriented Records
Source-oriented records, or SOR, are medical record-keeping organized by the data source. The SOR system was first developed in the mid-1900s to organize the growing patient data in hospitals and other healthcare facilities.
In an SOR, each discipline involved in patient care maintains a separate medical record section. This record-keeping method enables easy tracking of patient progress and ensures healthcare staff have access to up-to-date information.
Key Attributes include the following:
In an SOR, each discipline involved in patient care maintains a separate medical record section. This record-keeping method enables easy tracking of patient progress and ensures healthcare staff have access to up-to-date information.
Key Attributes include the following:
01:15Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
01:30Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
01:30Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) primarily center around electronically documenting patients' health information within a single healthcare organization or practice. They contain essential clinical data related to a patient's medical history, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, lab results, and other pertinent information relevant to the specific encounter or episode of care. EMRs are designed to streamline documentation and workflow processes within individual healthcare settings,...
01:20Introduction to Documentation and Reporting
Documentation is the systematic process of formally recording, maintaining, and communicating information.
Nursing documentation records essential information and details regarding a patient's care and treatment in written or electronic form. It is a critical aspect of nursing practice that involves documenting assessments, interventions, outcomes, and other relevant details about a patient's health status.
Documentation maps the patient's health journey by creating a comprehensive and precise...
Nursing documentation records essential information and details regarding a patient's care and treatment in written or electronic form. It is a critical aspect of nursing practice that involves documenting assessments, interventions, outcomes, and other relevant details about a patient's health status.
Documentation maps the patient's health journey by creating a comprehensive and precise...
01:11Purpose of Health Records I
The vital purpose of health records is to provide a complete and accurate account of a patient's medical history, including communication, diagnostic and therapeutic orders, care planning, research, and quality review.
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Sort by
Same author
State Cost Growth Benchmark Programs and Total Medical Expenditures, 2010 to 2020.
JAMA network open·2026
Same author
Estimated impact of the Aliso Canyon disaster on emergency department visits.
Environment international·2026
Same author
Geographic Variation in Amputations for Medicare Patients With Diabetic Lower-Extremity Wounds.
JAMA network open·2026
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026
07:26
Executing Complexity-Increasing Queries in Relational (MySQL) and NoSQL (MongoDB and EXist) Size-Growing ISO/EN 13606 Standardized EHR Databases
Published on: March 19, 2018
Does concordance between data sources vary by medical organization type?
Diana M Tisnado1, John L Adams, Honghu Liu
1Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1736, USA. dtisnado@mednet.ucla.edu
The American Journal of Managed Care
|June 15, 2007
Summary
Patient self-reports and medical records show varying agreement based on medical organization type. Independent practice associations demonstrated lower concordance than medical groups, highlighting data collection challenges.
More Related Videos
Area of Science:
- Health services research
- Medical informatics
- Patient-reported outcomes
Background:
- Discrepancies in healthcare quality exist across patient populations and medical organizations.
- Understanding the consistency of data between patient self-reports and medical records is crucial for accurate quality assessment.
- The robustness of concordance metrics across different medical organization types is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether the concordance between patient self-report data and medical record data differs based on the type of medical organization.
- To control for patient demographics, health status, and the specific medical care domain when examining concordance variations.
- To assess the impact of medical organization type on the agreement between patient surveys and medical records.
Main Methods:
- An observational study involving 1270 patients from 39 West Coast medical organizations.
- Data on diagnosis, clinical services, counseling, and medication use were collected via medical records and patient self-report.
- Multivariate logistic regressions were used to analyze the effect of medical organization type (medical groups vs. independent practice associations) on five concordance measures, controlling for patient characteristics and care domain.
Main Results:
- Independent practice associations showed poorer agreement, lower survey specificity, and reduced medical record sensitivity compared to medical groups.
- Conversely, independent practice associations exhibited better medical record specificity than medical groups.
- These findings indicate significant variations in data concordance based on organizational structure.
Conclusions:
- Patient self-report and medical record data do not consistently measure healthcare quality across different types of medical organizations.
- There is a need for improved survey data collection methods that are effective across diverse patient populations.
- Enhancing the quality and consistency of clinical data within medical records is also recommended.