Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ensemble climate predictions using climate models and observational constraints.

Peter A Stott1, Chris E Forest

  • 1Hadley Centre for Climate Change (Reading Unit), Meteorology Building, University of Reading, Reading, UK. peter.stott@metoffice.gov.uk

Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences
|June 16, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

We need a global assessment of avoidable climate-change risks.

Nature·2026
Same author

Discrepancies in precipitation trends between observational and reanalysis datasets in the Amazon Basin.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Optimal life-cycle adaptation of coastal infrastructure under climate change.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Geological Net Zero and the need for disaggregated accounting for carbon sinks.

Nature·2024
Same author

Approaching 1.5 °C: how will we know we've reached this crucial warming mark?

Nature·2023
Same author

The influence of anthropogenic climate change on wet and dry summers in Europe.

Science bulletin·2023
Same journal

Inverse FIP effect plasma in the solar atmosphere: a synthesis of current understanding and new insights from AR 11967.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same journal

Signs of sulfur fractionation under high magnetic field strength.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same journal

First ionization potential fractionation of sulfur observed with spectral imaging of the coronal environment.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same journal

Chromospheric dynamics and turbulence regulate the solar FIP effect.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same journal

Exploring the link between wave activity in the photospheric velocity driver and the FIP bias in the solar corona.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same journal

Radiative hydrodynamic simulations of first ionization potential fractionation in solar flares.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
See all related articles

Observing past climate change provides robust constraints for future climate predictions. Two distinct modeling approaches yield consistent temperature change ranges, aiding adaptation and mitigation strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Climate science
  • Paleoclimatology
  • Climate modeling

Background:

  • Climate predictions are crucial for policy decisions.
  • Constraining predictions with historical data improves reliability.
  • General circulation models (GCMs) are key tools in climate science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare two distinct methods for constraining climate predictions using past climate data.
  • To assess the consistency of results from different modeling approaches.
  • To highlight the utility of robust climate predictions for adaptation and mitigation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing large ensembles from computationally efficient climate models.
  • Employing small ensembles from advanced coupled ocean-atmosphere GCMs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparing the predictive constraints derived from both methodologies.

    • Main Results:

    • Both approaches, despite their differences, produced consistent ranges for future temperature changes.
    • Independent techniques converged on similar probabilistic predictions.
    • Observed past climate changes offer reliable constraints on future climate scenarios.

    Conclusions:

    • Past climate observations provide robust constraints for climate predictions.
    • Consistent results from independent methods validate the findings.
    • Probabilistic climate predictions are valuable for climate change adaptation and mitigation planning.