Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biochemistry by design.

Barbara C Forrest1, Paul R Gross

  • 1Southeastern Louisiana University, SLU 10484, Hammond, LA 70402, USA. bforrest@selu.edu

Trends in Biochemical Sciences
|June 16, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ALBERTO MONROY (1913-1986).

The Biological bulletin·2018
Same author

Xeroxing life.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1978
Same journal

Peptideins: Navigating the gray zone of the proteome.

Trends in biochemical sciences·2026
Same journal

A metabolon channels nicotine biosynthesis.

Trends in biochemical sciences·2026
Same journal

Better call chaperone.

Trends in biochemical sciences·2026
Same journal

Biochemistry at scale: Seeing both the forest and the trees.

Trends in biochemical sciences·2026
Same journal

Voices across Asia and Oceania: Biochemistry across borders.

Trends in biochemical sciences·2026
Same journal

Metabolic control of RNA splicing by polyamines.

Trends in biochemical sciences·2026
See all related articles

Creationists use biochemistry to promote their doctrine, challenging evolutionary explanations for complex cellular structures. Scientists must remain vigilant against these persistent, pseudoscientific claims in education.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Science Education

Background:

  • Creationist efforts to promote their doctrine using scientific arguments, particularly in public education.
  • Biochemist Michael Behe's claims that complex biological systems (e.g., bacterial flagella, blood clotting, immune system) are irreducibly complex and not products of evolution.
  • Continued promotion of these claims by the Discovery Institute despite scientific refutations and legal setbacks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the strategy of using biochemistry to support creationist doctrines.
  • To highlight the ongoing efforts of creationist proponents like Michael Behe.
  • To assess the need for concern among scientists regarding the spread of these ideas.

Main Methods:

  • Review of creationist arguments presented by Michael Behe and the Discovery Institute.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of scientific counterarguments and refutations.
  • Examination of the public and international outreach of creationist initiatives.

    • Main Results:

    • Creationist arguments, particularly those from biochemistry, are actively promoted to gain public and educational acceptance.
    • Despite scientific consensus and legal challenges, these efforts persist and are expanding internationally.
    • These persistent efforts pose a challenge to the scientific community and science education.

    Conclusions:

    • Biochemists and the broader scientific community should be concerned about the persistent promotion of creationist pseudoscience.
    • Vigilance and active engagement are necessary to counter the infiltration of non-scientific doctrines into public understanding and education.
    • The scientific community must address the strategic use of scientific-sounding arguments to undermine established scientific principles.